The subject of this graduate work is Pilat's righteousness in the Gospel of John. With this piece I will try to re-evaluate, his responsibility for the condemnation of Lord Jesus Christ. I divided this work into five parts. In the first part, I briefly described Pilat's life, his management in the sphere of the courts, the military sphere, and the sphere of taxation. The second part of this paper describes Pilat's attitude towards Jews and the relationship of Christians to Pilate. According to the Jews, he was cruel, while Christians were still divided, one party condemned him as a cruel imperial servant, others defended and looked upon him as the means of our salvation. On this trace, the third part gives an interpretation, describing the lines in John's Gospel that describe the trial process to Pilate as the Roman Governor. It is important to emphasize that John in his gospel is not guilty of Jesus' death in Pilate, which was just the means by which it happened. He sees the guilt in the Jewish people, their representatives, and the clerics who accused him of it. Jesus was accused of calling himself for "Son of God," and "the Jewish King", which was a hereditary or insult to God. In the fourth part I described the Jewish Judges, their occurrence and their attitude and judgment about Jesus Christ. In the final part I brought my judgment on Pilate and his appearance before Jesus, in front of the great council and the Jewish people.