prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja
  Download
PDF 770.67 KB
master's thesis
Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja
Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2013. urn:nbn:hr:142:989841
Mehić, Nermina
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Depatrment of Psychology

Institutional repository: FFOS-repository

Cite this document

Mehić, N. (2013). Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja (Master's thesis). Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:989841

Mehić, Nermina. "Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2013. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:989841

Mehić, Nermina. "Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2013. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:989841

Mehić, N. (2013). 'Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, accessed 29 March 2025, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:989841

Mehić N. Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja [Master's thesis]. Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; 2013 [cited 2025 March 29] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:989841

N. Mehić, "Heuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Osijek, 2013. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:989841

Metadata
TitleHeuristici kao temelj moralnog prosuđivanja
Title (english)Heuristics as the basis of moral reasoning
AuthorNermina Mehić
MentorIgor Kardum (mentor)
Committee memberSilvija Ručević (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberDaniela Šincek (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberIgor Kardum (član povjerenstva)
GranterJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
(Depatrment of Psychology)
Osijek
Defense date and country2013-01-09, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Psychology
Other Applied Psychologies
Abstract
Jedno od najvažnijih pitanja u području psihologije morala jest koji je proces u podlozi moralnih prosudbi. Neke od novijih teorija predlažu heuristike. Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je provjeriti jesu li oni uključeni u proces moralnog prosuđivanja te su uzete dvije kategorije – opći (dostupnost, prepoznavanje, reprezentativnost) i moralni heuristici (milo za drago, kažnjavanje „švercera“ u kooperativnim savezništvima, incest, „sreća“ i trud kao znakovi za pomaganje, omisija). Nakon provedena... More četiri predistraživanja koja su služila za pripremu materijala i metodologije, glavni dio proveden je na uzorku od 84 studenta, podijeljenih u dvije eksperimentalne skupine, koje su se razlikovale po sadržaju dilema. Sudionici su rješavali osam moralnih dilema koje odgovaraju navedenim heuristicima putem računalne aplikacije. Rezultati su djelomično u skladu s postavljenom hipotezom. Od osam ispitanih heuristika, tri su utjecala na moralne prosudbe - heuristici incesta i omisije te milo za drago. Za prvi od ova tri, razlika je značajna samo u muškom dijelu uzorka. Točnije, spolni odnos između genetskih srodnika koji ne znaju da su brat i sestra češće se osuđuje nego između dvoje ljudi koji su odrasli misleći da su brat i sestra. Uskraćivanje pomoći odobrava se kada je u posljednjoj interakciji i osoba koja traži pomoć učinila isto, a moralni prijestup koji je rezultat akcije osuđuje se češće nego kada je rezultat omisije. Čini se da se barem neki od heuristika koriste i u moralnom prosuđivanju. Less
Abstract (english)
One of the most important questions in moral psychology is identifying the underlying process of moral judgement. Recent theories suggest heuristics. The aim of the present study is to examine whether heuristics are included in the process of moral judgement. Two different categories were considered: general (availability, recognition, representativeness) and moral heuristics (tit-for-tat, punishing free-riders in collective actions, incest, luck and effort as cues triggering alternative... More decision rules, omission). After completing four prestudies for the preparation of materials and methodology, the main part of the study was carried out on a sample of 84 students. They were divided in two experimental groups, differing in the content of the dilemmas. The participants answered eight moral dilemmas for each of aforementioned heuristics, using a computer application. The results confirmed the hypothesis only partially. Out of eight heuristics, only three had an effect on moral judgements – incest and omission heuristic, and tit-for-tat. For the incest heuristic, the difference is significant only for the male subsample. Specifically, sexual intercourse between brother and sister, who are not aware of their kinship is more often found morally unacceptable than between two people who grew up believing they are kin. Not helping someone is approved when the person in need did the same in the last interaction. Moral transgression is more often found morally wrong when it is a result of action rather than omission. It is plausible that people use at least some of the heuristics in moral judgement. Less
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:142:989841
Study programmeTitle: Psychology (single major); specializations in: Teacher Training
Course: Teacher Training
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra psihologije (magistar/magistra psihologije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2017-03-30 16:49:46
accessibility

closeAccessibilityrefresh

If you wish to permanently save changes, click on Save, if not - your settings will be reset when you restart the browser.