prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism
  Download
PDF 289.85 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism
Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, 23 (2021), 2; 423-440. urn:nbn:hr:186:926237
Cerovac, Ivan

Institutional repository: Repository of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Cite this document

Cerovac, I. (2021). Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism. Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, 23. (2), 423-440. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:926237

Cerovac, Ivan. "Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism." Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, vol. 23, no. 2, 2021, pp. 423-440. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:926237

Cerovac, Ivan. "Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism." Etica & politica = Ethics and politics 23, no. 2 (2021): 423-440. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:926237

Cerovac, I. (2021) 'Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism', Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, 23(2), pp. 423-440. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:926237 (Accessed 11 July 2024)

Cerovac I. Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism. Etica & politica = Ethics and politics [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 July 11];23(2):423-440. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:926237

I. Cerovac, "Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism", Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 423-440, 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:926237. [Accessed: 11 July 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Re-Reading Estlund: In Defense of Moderate Epistemic Proceduralism
AuthorIvan Cerovac
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (english)
This paper engages an elaborate critique that Prijić-Samaržija uses to disqualify moderate epistemic proceduralism as a proper approach to political legitimacy. The paper offers an alternative interpretation of Estlund's position, arguing that his position (contrary to Prijić- Samaržija's reading) represents a veritist account that locates procedure's epistemic value in its ability to produce the correct outcome. Furthermore, by introducing the distinction between collective decision-making procedures and collective decision-authorization procedures, it argues that moderate epistemic proceduralism can accommodate the special role of experts in its theoretical framework.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleEtica & politica = Ethics and politics
Numberingvol. 23, no. 2, pp. 423-440
p-ISSN1825-5167
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:186:926237
Publication2021
ProjectNumber: IP-2018-01-3518
Title (croatian): Odgovori na antisocijalne osobnosti u demokratskom društvu
Acronym: RAD
Leader: Luca Malatesti
Jurisdiction: Croatia
Funding stream: IP
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/1138343
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) icon
Created on2022-12-20 09:29:47