prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti
Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, 2016. urn:nbn:hr:172:461047
Rogić, Antonia
University of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Department of Pedagogy

Institutional repository: Repository of Faculty of humanities and social sciences

Cite this document

Rogić, A. (2016). Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti (Master's thesis). Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:461047

Rogić, Antonia. "Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:461047

Rogić, Antonia. "Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:461047

Rogić, A. (2016). 'Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti', Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, accessed 04 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:461047

Rogić A. Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti [Master's thesis]. Split: University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; 2016 [cited 2024 November 04] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:461047

A. Rogić, "Metodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti", Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Split, 2016. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:172:461047

Metadata
TitleMetodološka analiza različitih istraživačkih pristupa darovitosti
AuthorAntonia Rogić
MentorTonća Jukić (mentor)
Committee memberTonća Jukić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberIvana Batarelo Kokić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberAndreja Bubić (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Split
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
(Department of Pedagogy)
Split
Defense date and country2016-01-25, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Pedagogy
Abstract
Svrha svakog znanstvenog istraživanja je spoznaja i pomicanje granica postojećeg ljudskog znanja. Prilikom istraživanja znanstvenici se uvijek vode određenom metodologijom, kvantitativnom, kvalitativnom ili njihovom kombinacijom. Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je utvrditi sličnosti i razlike sa aspekta metodološkog pristupa između četiri znanstvena djela koja su imala zajedničku temu stavova prema darovitim učenicima. U ovom je radu naglasak stavljen na usporedbu kvantitativne i kvalitativne metodologije, a također su se analizirale struktura i sastavni elementi odabranih znanstvenih djela, dok sam sadržaj nije bio relevantan. Dobiveni rezultati pokazali su praćenje temeljnih načela metodološke strukture znanstvenog djela i ostvarenost kriterija sa manjim odmacima i nedostacima. Usprkos različitim metodološkim pristupima, sve spoznaje su vrijedne i obogaćuju postojeći fond znanja koja imamo o darovitim učenicima. Ipak, došlo se do zaključka kako je kombinirana metodologija gdje se koristila metodološka triangulacija imala najpotpunije i najsveobuhvatnije istraživanje.
Abstract (english)
Purpose of every scientific research is cognition and moving boundaries of existing human knowledge. During research scientists always lead with certain methodology, quantitative, qualitative or their combination. The purpose of this research was to determine from the aspect of methodological approach similarities and differences between four scientific papers with common theme of attitudes towards gifted students. In this paper particular attention is paid to the comparison between quantitative and qualitative methodology with analysis of structure and constitutive elements of chosen scientific papers, while the mere content was not relevant. The results have shown that there is the following of basic principles of scientific paper's methodological structure and realization of criteria with minor distances and lacks. Despite different methodological approaches, every cognition is important and enriches our fund of knowledge we have about gifted students. Although, the conclusion is that combined methodology which used methodological triangulation had the most complete and comprehensive research.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:172:461047
Study programmeTitle: /
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra pedagogije (magistar/magistra pedagogije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2017-09-28 11:40:39