prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis
  Download
PDF 443.73 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 28 (2019), 4; e1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803
Levis, Brooke; McMillan, Dean; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Rice, Danielle B.; Krishnan, Ankur; Wu, Yin; Azar, Marleine; Sanchez, Tatiana A.; Chiovitti, Matthew J.; Bhandari, Parash Mani; Neupane, Dipika; Saadat, Nazanin; Riehm, Kira E.; Imran, Mahrukh; Boruff, Jill T.; Cuijpers, Pim; Gilbody, Simon; Ioannidis, John P.A.; Kloda, Lorie A.; Patten, Scott B.; Shrier, Ian; Ziegelstein, Roy C.; Comeau, Liane; Mitchell, Nicholas D.; Tonelli, Marcello; Vigod, Simone N.; Aceti, Franca; Alvarado, Rubén; Alvarado‐Esquivel, Cosme; Bakare, Muideen O.; Barnes, Jacqueline; Beck, Cheryl Tatano; Bindt, Carola; Boyce, Philip M.; Bunevicius, Adomas; Couto, Tiago Castro e; Chaudron, Linda H.; Correa, Humberto; Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro; Eapen, Valsamma; Fernandes, Michelle; Figueiredo, Barbara; Fisher, Jane R.W.; Garcia‐Esteve, Lluïsa; Giardinelli, Lisa; Helle, Nadine; Howard, Louise M.; Khalifa, Dina Sami; Kohlhoff, Jane; Kusminskas, Laima; Kozinszky, Zoltán; Lelli, Lorenzo; Leonardou, Angeliki A.; Lewis, Beth A.; Maes, Michael; Meuti, Valentina; Nakić Radoš, Sandra; Navarro García, Purificación; Nishi, Daisuke; Okitundu Luwa E‐Andjafono, Daniel; Robertson‐Blackmore, Emma; Rochat, Tamsen J.; Rowe, Heather J.; Siu, Bonnie W.M.; Skalkidou, Alkistis; Stein, Alan; Stewart, Robert C.; Su, Kuan‐Pin; Sundström‐Poromaa, Inger; Tadinac, Meri; Tandon, S. Darius; Tendais, Iva; Thiagayson, Pavaani; Töreki, Annamária; Torres‐Giménez, Anna; Tran, Thach D.; Trevillion, Kylee; Turner, Katherine; Vega‐Dienstmaier, Johann M.; Wynter, Karen; Yonkers, Kimberly A.; Benedetti, Andrea; Thombs, Brett D. More authors...

Institutional repository: ODRAZ

Cite this document

Levis, B., McMillan, D., Sun, Y., He, C., Rice, D. B., Krishnan, A. ... Thombs, B. D. (2019). Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 28. (4). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1803

Levis, Brooke, et al. "Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis." International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, vol. 28, no. 4, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803

Levis, Brooke, Dean McMillan, Ying Sun, Chen He, Danielle B. Rice, Ankur Krishnan, Yin Wu, et al. "Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis." International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 28, no. 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803

Levis, B., et al. (2019) 'Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis', International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 28(4). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1803

Levis B, McMillan D, Sun Y, He C, Rice DB, Krishnan A, and sur.. Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research [Internet]. 2019 September 30 [cited 2024 November 28];28(4). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1803

B. Levis, et al., "Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis", International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, vol. 28, no. 4, September 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:132847. [Accessed: 28 November 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta‐analysis
AuthorBrooke Levis
AuthorDean McMillan
AuthorYing Sun
AuthorChen He
AuthorDanielle B. Rice
AuthorAnkur Krishnan
AuthorYin Wu
AuthorMarleine Azar
AuthorTatiana A. Sanchez
AuthorMatthew J. Chiovitti
AuthorParash Mani Bhandari
AuthorDipika Neupane
AuthorNazanin Saadat
AuthorKira E. Riehm
AuthorMahrukh Imran
AuthorJill T. Boruff
AuthorPim Cuijpers
AuthorSimon Gilbody
AuthorJohn P.A. Ioannidis
AuthorLorie A. Kloda
AuthorScott B. Patten
AuthorIan Shrier
AuthorRoy C. Ziegelstein
AuthorLiane Comeau
AuthorNicholas D. Mitchell
AuthorMarcello Tonelli
AuthorSimone N. Vigod
AuthorFranca Aceti
AuthorRubén Alvarado
AuthorCosme Alvarado‐Esquivel
AuthorMuideen O. Bakare
AuthorJacqueline Barnes
AuthorCheryl Tatano Beck
AuthorCarola Bindt
AuthorPhilip M. Boyce
AuthorAdomas Bunevicius
AuthorTiago Castro e Couto
AuthorLinda H. Chaudron
AuthorHumberto Correa
AuthorFelipe Pinheiro Figueiredo
AuthorValsamma Eapen
AuthorMichelle Fernandes
AuthorBarbara Figueiredo
AuthorJane R.W. Fisher
AuthorLluïsa Garcia‐Esteve
AuthorLisa Giardinelli
AuthorNadine Helle
AuthorLouise M. Howard
AuthorDina Sami Khalifa
AuthorJane Kohlhoff
AuthorLaima Kusminskas
AuthorZoltán Kozinszky
AuthorLorenzo Lelli
AuthorAngeliki A. Leonardou
AuthorBeth A. Lewis
AuthorMichael Maes
AuthorValentina Meuti
AuthorSandra Nakić Radoš
AuthorPurificación Navarro García
AuthorDaisuke Nishi
AuthorDaniel Okitundu Luwa E‐Andjafono
AuthorEmma Robertson‐Blackmore
AuthorTamsen J. Rochat
AuthorHeather J. Rowe
AuthorBonnie W.M. Siu
AuthorAlkistis Skalkidou
AuthorAlan Stein
AuthorRobert C. Stewart
AuthorKuan‐Pin Su
AuthorInger Sundström‐Poromaa
AuthorMeri Tadinac
AuthorS. Darius Tandon
AuthorIva Tendais
AuthorPavaani Thiagayson
AuthorAnnamária Töreki
AuthorAnna Torres‐Giménez
AuthorThach D. Tran
AuthorKylee Trevillion
AuthorKatherine Turner
AuthorJohann M. Vega‐Dienstmaier
AuthorKaren Wynter
AuthorKimberly A. Yonkers
AuthorAndrea Benedetti
AuthorBrett D. Thombs
Author's institutionCatholic University of Croatia
(Department of Psychology)
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
(Department of Psychology)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Psychology
Clinical and Health Psychology
Abstract (english)
Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient HealthQuestionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), CompositeInternational Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM(SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results:Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2, 532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2, 948 participants, 194 major depression cases ; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID(28 studies, 7, 403 participants, 1, 027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI(interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95%CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Numberingvol. 28, no. 4, e1803
p-ISSN1049-8931
e-ISSN1557-0657
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:131:132847
Publication2019-09-30
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) icon
Created on2020-10-22 13:35:37