How individuals make a decision depends on their decision-making style, that is, how they usually experience different situations and collect and process information (Harren, 1979). Employees within the organization can influence their decisions to their own careers and many work outcomes of the entire organization. This paper aims to examine the relationship between rational and intuitive decision-making styles and personal reputation, decision-making quality, and promotability. It is also important to test whether the experience moderates the relationship between these variables. The research was conducted as an online questionnaire survey with a sample of 182 participants (103 women and 79 men) aged 19 to 63 years. The following questionnaires were used: rational and intuitive style from General decision-making styles scale (Scoot and Bruce, 1995), a scale of Personal Reputation (Hochwarter, Ferris, Zinko, Arnell, and James, 2007), a scale of Decision-making quality (Wood, 2012) and a scale of Promotability (Thacker and Wayne, 1995). The rational style was statistically significant positively correlated with decision-making quality and the intuitive style was negatively correlated with decision-making quality. The correlation between rational style and intuitive style with personal reputation and promotability did not prove to be statistically significant. Experience does not moderate the relationship between rational style and decision-making quality, as well as rational style and promotability. Contrary to expectations, experience does not moderate the relationship between decision-making styles and work outcomes and experience moderates the relationship between rational style and personal reputation.