prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Anatomija „lošeg“ filma
  Download
PDF 3.63 MB
master's thesis
Anatomija „lošeg“ filma
aspekti filmskog vrednovanja
Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023. urn:nbn:hr:131:145610
Herbai, Lovro
University of Zagreb
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Department of Comparative literature

Institutional repository: ODRAZ

Cite this document

Herbai, L. (2023). Anatomija „lošeg“ filma : aspekti filmskog vrednovanja (Master's thesis). Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:145610

Herbai, Lovro. "Anatomija „lošeg“ filma : aspekti filmskog vrednovanja." Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:145610

Herbai, Lovro. "Anatomija „lošeg“ filma : aspekti filmskog vrednovanja." Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:145610

Herbai, L. (2023). 'Anatomija „lošeg“ filma : aspekti filmskog vrednovanja', Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, accessed 25 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:145610

Herbai L. Anatomija „lošeg“ filma : aspekti filmskog vrednovanja [Master's thesis]. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; 2023 [cited 2024 November 25] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:145610

L. Herbai, "Anatomija „lošeg“ filma : aspekti filmskog vrednovanja", Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Zagreb, 2023. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:145610

Metadata
TitleAnatomija „lošeg“ filma : aspekti filmskog vrednovanja
Title (english)Anatomy of a 'Bad' Film : Aspects of Film Evaluation
AuthorLovro Herbai
MentorKrunoslav Lučić (mentor)
Committee memberVišnja Rogošić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberPetra Požgaj (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberKrunoslav Lučić (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Zagreb
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
(Department of Comparative literature)
Zagreb
Defense date and country2023-09-21, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Art Sciences
Filmology
Abstract
Filmovi koji su ispodprosječne kritičke i gledateljske recepcije često su zanemarivani u filmološkim analizama, recenzijama i povijesnim pregledima. Rad teži svojevrsnoj promjeni perspektive pri sagledavanju „loših“ filmova, uključujući pritom i kultne filmova kao i one koji su „toliko loši da su dobri“. Objašnjavanjem pojmova „dobrog“ i „lošeg“, ističe se maglovitost pojmova i njihova neodređenost, u potpunosti ovisna o onome koji se tim pojmovima koristi. Isto tako pojašnjava se razlikovnost umjetničkog filma te onog „zabavljačkog“ prije nego što se preko termina odgođenog vrednovanja analiziraju tri filma – u kategorijama „remek-djela“, „kultnog filma“ i „so-bad-it's-good filma“ – naglašavajući njihove kvalitete unatoč slaboj kritičkoj recepciji, a koji nisu bili cijenjeni u vrijeme izlaska. U tom pogledu analiziran je i Freddy Got Fingered, ozloglašen film notorno loše recepcije, ali u svjetlu neo-nadrealizma koji film prisvaja i daje mu drugačiju interpretaciju.
Abstract (english)
Films which are met with below-average critical and public reception are oftentimes neglected in film analyses, reviews and historical overviews. This paper aims at a change of perspective when it comes to viewing „bad“ films, including cult films as well as those which are „so bad they're good“. By defining the concepts of „good“ and „bad“, the ambiguity of these terms and their vagueness is highlighted as it depends entirely on the person who wields the terms. The difference between an art film and a „fun“ film is also discussed before three films are analyzed through the concept of delayed valuation – each one hailing from a category of either a „masterpiece“, a „cult film“ or a „so-bad-it's-good“ film – highlighting their qualities despite poor critical reception and not being appreciated by the public at the time of their release. In that view, Freddy Got Fingered is also analyzed, an infamous film with notoriously negative reception, but in the context of neo-surrealism which the film adopts and which gives it a different interpretation.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:131:145610
Study programmeTitle: Comparative Literature
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra komparativne književnosti (magistar/magistra komparativne književnosti)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-09-21 20:15:23