Although female scientists are in a better position now than they have been historically, there exist indications that gender inequality in favor of men persists in science to this day. This is true for psychology as well, a scientific field that stands at the forefront in the inclusion of women, as women in psychology lag behind men in measures of scientific productivity and impact. Using a sample of authorships of Croatian psychologists published between 2014 and 2020 we analyzed the relationships between the variables of author gender, year of publishing, and journal region. We defined journal region as those journals published either in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) or those published in Western Europe or North America (non-CEE). CEE journals generally have a more modest impact, and most articles in that group were published in Croatian journals. We found the existence of gender inequality by journal region: although female authorships outnumbered male ones in both regions, instances of male authorship were relatively overrepresented in non-CEE journals and relatively underrepresented in CEE journals, while for women it was the reverse. Both male and female instances of authorship saw an increase over the measured period. Looking at male and female instances of authorship separately through time, up until 2020 the ratio of CEE to non-CEE instances of authorship remained stable, but 2020 saw, in both genders, a sharp uptick in instances of non-CEE authorships. We are unable to tell whether or not this signifies the beginning of a new trend. A subsample of first authorships yielded comparable results.