prikaz prve stranice dokumenta The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images
  Download
PDF 375.72 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images
Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67 (2022), 5; 1938-1947. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15100
Jerković, Ivan; Bašić, Željana; Bareša, Tina; Krešić, Elvira; Hadžić, Anita Adamić; Dolić, Krešimir; Ćavar Borić, Marija; Budimir Mršić, Danijela; Čavka, Mislav; Šlaus, Mario; Primorac, Dragan; Anđelinović, Šimun; Kružić, Ivana

Citations: ,
Scopus (5)

Institutional repository: Repository of University Department for Forensic Sciences

Cite this document

Jerković, I., Bašić, Ž., Bareša, T., Krešić, E., Hadžić, A. A., Dolić, K. ... Kružić, I. (2022). The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67. (5), 1938-1947. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15100

Jerković, Ivan, et al. "The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images." Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 67, no. 5, 2022, pp. 1938-1947. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15100

Jerković, Ivan, Željana Bašić, Tina Bareša, Elvira Krešić, Anita Adamić Hadžić, Krešimir Dolić, Marija Ćavar Borić, et al. "The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images." Journal of Forensic Sciences 67, no. 5 (2022): 1938-1947. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15100

Jerković, I., et al. (2022) 'The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images', Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67(5), pp. 1938-1947. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15100

Jerković I, Bašić Ž, Bareša T, Krešić E, Hadžić AA, Dolić K, and sur.. The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images. Journal of Forensic Sciences [Internet]. 2022 July 21 [cited 2025 April 04];67(5):1938-1947. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15100

I. Jerković, et al., "The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images", Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1938-1947, July 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:227:286651. [Accessed: 04 April 2025]

Metadata
Title (english)The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images
AuthorIvan Jerković
AuthorŽeljana Bašić
AuthorTina Bareša
AuthorElvira Krešić
AuthorAnita Adamić Hadžić
AuthorKrešimir Dolić
AuthorMarija Ćavar Borić
AuthorDanijela Budimir Mršić
AuthorMislav Čavka
AuthorMario Šlaus
AuthorDragan Primorac
AuthorŠimun Anđelinović
AuthorIvana Kružić
Author's institutionUniversity of Split
School of Medicine
Author's institutionUniversity of Split
University Department of Forensic Sciences
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Basic Medical Sciences
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Security and Defense Science
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Ethnology and Anthropology
Abstract (english)
This study examined if the cranial measurements from Data Collection Procedures for Forensic Skeletal Material 2.0 are repeatable when measured in dry bones and MSCT images and if the virtual measurements correspond to the physical ones. The sample included 33 dry crania imaged by MSCT. Two observers measured dry bones, two placed landmarks on 2D and 3D MSCT reconstructions, and one conducted measurements/landmarking on both media. One of the observers for each media repeated the measurements.... More Technical and relative technical error of measurement (TEM and rTEM) and percentage differences were calculated to examine the repeatability of measurements and compare measuring modalities. Intraobserver rTEM was above 1.5% for six bone measurements: FOB, ZOB, OBB, NLH, DKB, MDH (1.51%–4.87%) and for seven MSCT measurements: OBH, FOB, OBB, MDH, NLB, ZOB, DKB (1.57%–5.55%). The interobserver rTEM was above the acceptable level (>2%) for 11 measurements: PAC, NLH, OBB, EKB, MAL, FOB, NLB, OBH, ZOB, DKB, and MDH (2.01%–9.34%). The percentage differences were not systematically larger for measurements taken by the same user on both modalities than those obtained by different users on the same modality. When physical and MSCT measurements were tested on sex classification standards, the proportion of crania classified as male or female did not significantly differ (P > 0.05). The study showed that physical and virtual cranial measurements could be interchangeable for developing or applying sex estimation standards. However, clarifications and adaptations are necessary for measurements of mastoid, nasal, and orbital regions that did not meet the standard criteria. Less
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionAccepted version
Journal titleJournal of Forensic Sciences
Numberingvol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1938-1947
p-ISSN0022-1198
e-ISSN1556-4029
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15100
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:227:286651
Publication2022-07-21
Document URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.15100
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) icon
Created on2024-06-10 13:24:05
accessibility

closeAccessibilityrefresh

If you wish to permanently save changes, click on Save, if not - your settings will be reset when you restart the browser.