The content of this thesis is the analysis of the display of migrant crisis in certain Croatian media from the moment of entry of refugees to Croatia to the closing of the Balkan route. In that purpose two daily newspapers and three portal sites have been analyzed. This thesis seeks to ascertain whether the refugees were more often portrayed in a positive or negative sense, ie. whether the articles were of negative, positive or neutral character – are refugees people who can contribute to the society or are they a threat to it. Also, the thesis shows whether the reporting style was different before closing the Balkan route compared to the style when to route was opened. Also, whether the number of news about the migrat crisis gradually decreased through time. Furthermore, thesis brings the results in which can be seen if the media used more the term migrant, refugee or asylum seeker. It is regulated that the migrant is a person who moves to another country beacuse of economic reasons, a refugee moves bacause of war. It is shown in the thesis whether the terms were used correctly. Subsequently, lists of sources that the media quoted are laid out - politicians (domestic or foreign), migrants, civil society, public authorities, citizens, experts (political analysts and sociologists). Over and above the thesis will give the reasons for the arrival of refugees in the EU and answer whether the media offered any solution to the migrant crisis. End of the thesis brings a summary of the analysis which shows how did selected Croatian media report on the migrant crisis in general.