During the last thirty years in the postmodern Western liberal societies, according to the rise in the number of asylum seekers, there has been an increase in the scientific interest in the phenomenon of refugeeism and (ir)regular migrations. The problem of refugeeism is gaining prominence in political discourse, so public policies and political programs are created with it in mind. Due to the pressure of globalization processes, rising inequality, poverty, political instability and conflict, a rising number of people is forced to abandon their homes to protect their bare lives. In the context of the global neoliberal order, defined by Hardt and Negri as an Empire, the triumph of "the end of history" is taking place, and the category of human life presents the basis of political legitimacy. In this work, the author problematizes refugeeism from the perspective of biopolitics theory and offers a critical interpretation of refugeeism and the phenomenon of asylum seekers. Analysis of refugeeism starts with general notions of biopolitics, biopower, sovreignty, dispositives, discourse, postmodernism and neoliberalism and moves onto specific notions such as biopolitics of refugeeism, postmodern humanitarianism and the bare lives of the refugees and asylum seekers in a state of emergency. From Foucault to Agamben, the problematizing of biopolitics as a dominant form of politics in the postpolitical age enables us to critically analyze refugeeism and ask questions about the modern political order, which is based on the triad of sovereigntyterritory-nation. Refugeeism as a liminal social phenomenon in the age of biopolitics, is indicative of allcontradictions and limitations of contemporary liberal democracies and it requires a new political philosophy, a (re)construction of the idea of political community and subjectivity, and it forces us to redefine notions such as freedom and human rights. Keywords