| Abstract (croatian) | Aristotel se sučeljava s više tradiranih pojmova nereda. To je prije svega nered koji kao koincidencija svega, tj. mirovanje prethodi kretanju. Taj pojam nereda dolazi Aristotelu od Anaksagore. Zatim to je nered kao mirovanje u međuvlađu između uređenih kretanja suprotnog smjera. Taj pojam nereda stisnutog između uređenih gibanja tradiran je Aristotelu od Empedokla. I konačno to je pojam nereda koji više nije mirovanje, nego kretanje, pojam neinteligibilnog, nespoznatljivog, razumom nedohvatnog kretanja. Taj pojam nereda dolazi Aristotelu od Zenona. Sve te pojmove nereda Aristotel odbacuje i u tom odbacivanju koncipira fiziku kao teorijsku znanost. Ipak i u fizici kao teorijskoj znanosti prisutan je pojam nereda, slučaja. On se temelji u pojmovima mogućnosti i ne-bića. Pritom zavređuje pažnju da se pojam slučaja ili, da tako kažem, prihvatljivog nereda temelji na istim onim strukturnim elementima kojima se dokazuje inteligibilnost, tj. uređenost, zakonitost i spoznatljivost kretanja. U drugom dijelu članka analizira se Petrićeva kritika Aristotelovih pojmova nereda. |
| Abstract (english) | Aristotle confronted several inherited notions of disorder. Above all, it was disorder that, as a coincidence of everyting, i. e. stationariness, preceded motion. This notion of disorder came to Aristotle from Anaxagoras. Then there was disorder as stationariness in the period between ordered motions in opposite directions, which came from Empedocles. Finally, there was the notion of disorder which was no longer stationariness, but motion, a notion of unintelligible, unknowable motion, ungraspable by reason, which came from Zeno. Aristotle rejected all these notions of disorder and, rejecting them, he conceived physics as a theoretical science. Nevertheless, there is a notion of disorder, of chance, even in physics as a theoretical science. It is based in the notions of possibility and non-being. It is noteworthy that the notion of chance, or, so to say, of acceptable disorder, is based on the same structural elements which are used as proof of intelligibility, i. e. orderliness, regularity and knowability of motion. Petrić’s critique of Aristotle’s concepts of disorder is analysed in the second part of the article. |
