prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?
No public access
Scientific paper - Preliminary note / Short communication
Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?
AJOB neuroscience, 11 (2020), 1; 67-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922
Ivanković, Viktor; Savić, Lovro

Institutional repository: Repository of the Institute of Philosophy

Cite this document

Ivanković, V. & Savić, L. (2020). Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?. AJOB neuroscience, 11. (1), 67-70. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922

Ivanković, Viktor and Lovro Savić. "Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?." AJOB neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020, pp. 67-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922

Ivanković, Viktor and Lovro Savić. "Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?." AJOB neuroscience 11, no. 1 (2020): 67-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922

Ivanković, V. and Savić, L. (2020) 'Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?', AJOB neuroscience, 11(1), pp. 67-70. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922

Ivanković V, Savić L. Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?. AJOB neuroscience [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 November 28];11(1):67-70. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922

V. Ivanković and L. Savić, "Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?", AJOB neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67-70, 2020. [Online]. . [Accessed: 28 November 2024]

Cite this item: Available after object activation...
Metadata
Title (english)Does Mental Discipline Partially Restore the Responsibility of BCI Users?
AuthorViktor Ivanković https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0007-1258
AuthorLovro Savić
Author's institutionInstitute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Philosophy of Bioethics
Abstract (english)
In their article “When thinking is doing: Responsibility of BCI-mediated action requires special attention in terms of controllability and foreseeability of outcomes, ” Rainey et al. (2020) present a strong case that action carried out via brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) is different in morally relevant ways to “conventional” action. The account, however, leaves unexplored the extent to which users can build up mental discipline in BCI-mediated activity, and how this affects the ascription of responsibility. By mental discipline, we understand the ability of BCI users to minimize involuntary mental triggers of BCIs, or take precautions when they can foresee them. We discuss several ways in which mental discipline seems feasible.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Preliminary note / Short communication
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleAJOB neuroscience
Numberingvol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67-70
p-ISSN2150-7740
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922
Publication2020
Document URLhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21507740.2019.1704922?fbclid=IwAR3t7lnvsIA0UIbjaYdFXHqeRXoTUJn9vxS1qNz6OW8NfIV9gDGuvUZfQec&forwardService=showFullText&tokenAccess=JN5JR6G9HXFYYRURPHXG&tokenDomain=eprints&doi=10.1080%2F21507740.2019.1704922&doi=10.1080%2F21507740.2019.1704922&doi=10.1080%2F21507740.2019.1704922&target=10.1080%2F21507740.2019.1704922&journalCode=uabn20
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsClosed access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-12-20 08:46:01