prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija
  Download
PDF 93.52 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija
Croatian Medical Journal, 43 (2002), 1; 33-36. urn:nbn:hr:184:991147
Jugovac, Izabela; Burgić, Nijaz; Mićović, Vladimir; Radolović-Prenc, Lorena; Uravić, Miljenko; Golubović, Vesna; Stančić, Marin F.

Institutional repository: Repository of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine

Cite this document

Jugovac, I., Burgić, N., Mićović, V., Radolović Prenc, L., Uravić, M., Golubović, V. & Stančić, M. F. (2002). Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija. Croatian Medical Journal, 43. (1), 33-36. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:991147

Jugovac, Izabela, et al. "Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija." Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 43, no. 1, 2002, pp. 33-36. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:991147

Jugovac, Izabela, Nijaz Burgić, Vladimir Mićović, Lorena Radolović Prenc, Miljenko Uravić, Vesna Golubović and Marin F. Stančić. "Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija." Croatian Medical Journal 43, no. 1 (2002): 33-36. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:991147

Jugovac, I., et al. (2002) 'Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija', Croatian Medical Journal, 43(1), pp. 33-36. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:991147 (Accessed 26 December 2024)

Jugovac I, Burgić N, Mićović V, Radolović Prenc L, Uravić M, Golubović V, and sur.. Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija. Croatian Medical Journal [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2024 December 26];43(1):33-36. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:991147

I. Jugovac, et al., "Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija", Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 33-36, 2002. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:991147. [Accessed: 26 December 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Dekompresija karpalnog tunela mikroinvazivnom ili klasičnom tehnikom: Randomizirana kontrolirana studija
Title (english)Carpal Tunnel Release by Limited Palmar Incision vs Traditional Open Technique: Randomized Controlled Trial
AuthorIzabela Jugovac
AuthorNijaz Burgić
AuthorVladimir Mićović
AuthorLorena Radolović-Prenc
AuthorMiljenko Uravić
AuthorVesna Golubović
AuthorMarin F. Stančić
MBZ: 145376
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
(Department of Anaesthesiology,reanimatology and Intensive Care)
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
(Department of Neurosurgery)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Abstract (english)
Aim. To compare a limited palmar incision for carpal tunnel release (CTR) with a traditional open technique, which is still considered the gold standard. Methods. Seventy-two patients with a carpal tunnel syndrome were individually randomized into the trial (limited incision CTR) (n=36) and control group (traditional technique CTR) (n=36). In the trial group, skin incision parallel to the thenar crease was made up to 2.5 cm in length, under an operating microscope and endoscopic transillumination. Skin incision in the control group began at the distal border of the carpal ligament, followed the longitudinal crease of the palm, and crossed the base of the palm in a zigzag fashion. Three months after surgery, the patients were asked about symptomatic relief and intervals between the operation and return to their daily activities and work, and examined for scar tenderness and esthetic outcome. Distal motor latency, conduction velocity, scar length, scar width, and operation time were measured. Results. There were no differences between the two groups in symptomatic relief and electrophysiological parameters. Intervals between the operation and return to daily activities (median 5 days, range 2-15) were shorter in the trial group than in the control group (median 10 days, range 2-21 ; p<0.001), as well as the intervals between the operation and return to work (median 15 days, range 5-45 vs median 30 days, range 10-60 ; p<0.001). Scar/pillar tenderness, scar length and width, esthetic outcome, and operation time were significantly better in the trial group. Conclusion. Limited palmar incision CTR is as effective and safe as traditional CTR technique, but with better postoperative recovery and cosmetic results.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleCroatian Medical Journal
Numberingvol. 43, no. 1, pp. 33-36
p-ISSN0353-9504
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:991147
Publication2002
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/93838
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) icon
Created on2020-04-27 18:53:19