prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study
Journal of orthopaedic science, 21 (2016), 2; 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010
Tudor, Anton; Ružić, Lana; Vučković, Mirela; Prpić, Tomislav; Rakovac, Ivan; Mađarević, Tomislav; Legović, Dalen; Šantić, Veljko; Mihelić, Radovan; Šestan, Branko

Institutional repository: Repository of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine

Cite this document

Tudor, A., Ružić, L., Vučković, M., Prpić, T., Rakovac, I., Mađarević, T. ... Šestan, B. (2016). Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study. Journal of orthopaedic science, 21. (2), 184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010

Tudor, Anton, et al. "Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study." Journal of orthopaedic science, vol. 21, no. 2, 2016, pp. 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010

Tudor, Anton, Lana Ružić, Mirela Vučković, Tomislav Prpić, Ivan Rakovac, Tomislav Mađarević, Dalen Legović, Veljko Šantić, Radovan Mihelić and Branko Šestan. "Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study." Journal of orthopaedic science 21, no. 2 (2016): 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010

Tudor, A., et al. (2016) 'Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study', Journal of orthopaedic science, 21(2), pp. 184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010

Tudor A, Ružić L, Vučković M, Prpić T, Rakovac I, Mađarević T, and sur.. Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study. Journal of orthopaedic science [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 January 09];21(2):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010

A. Tudor, et al., "Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study", Journal of orthopaedic science, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 184-190, 2016. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:681898. [Accessed: 09 January 2025]

Metadata
Title (english)Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study
AuthorAnton Tudor
MBZ: 216533
AuthorLana Ružić
MBZ: 246573
AuthorMirela Vučković
AuthorTomislav Prpić
AuthorIvan Rakovac
AuthorTomislav Mađarević
AuthorDalen Legović
AuthorVeljko Šantić
AuthorRadovan Mihelić
AuthorBranko Šestan
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
(Department of Orthopedics and Physical Medicine)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Orthopedics
Abstract (english)
BACKGROUND: The muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty had generated a distinguishable interest, in both the patients and the surgeons, but its benefits are still often questioned. The main idea of this study was to compare the functional clinical outcome of the patients operated by the anterolateral approach with a muscle-sparing technique (modified Watson-Jones approach), and the patients operated by modified direct lateral approach without the muscle-sparing technique (Bauer/Hardinge approach). METHODS: The patients (N = 130) were divided into two groups: 68 in a standard method group (STAND) and 62 patients in a muscle sparing surgery group (MSS). The hip flexibility, mobility, the strength of the hip abduction, the pain scale, Harris hip scores, the duration of the hospital stay and the overall satisfaction were measured seven days, three months, one year and three years (in 80 patients) after the surgery. There were no differences in any of the parameters between the groups prior to the procedure. RESULTS: The statistically significant differences in first three follow-ups (up to one year) were determined between the groups in passive and active hip flexion ability but the hip abduction strength, which is a crucial parameter for functional recovery, and 50 m walk test remained better in MSS group even after three years. Patients, who underwent MSS suffered also less pain, stayed in hospital shorter and were more satisfied with the operation outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The functional recovery in patients treated with muscle sparing method was faster than in patients operated with conventional lateral approach. Based on the results, we could recommend anterolateral muscle sparing approach for a total hip replacement for its faster and fuller functional recovery.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleJournal of orthopaedic science
Numberingvol. 21, no. 2, pp. 184-190
p-ISSN0949-2658
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:681898
Publication2016
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/817276
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsInstitutional access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-02-22 13:59:14