prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS
Access restricted to all Croatian higher education institution's students and staff
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS
Abdominal Radiology, 41 (2016), 3; 476-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0596-4
Grgurević, Ivica; Kujundžić, Milan; Banić, Marko; Kušec, Rajko; Bokun, Tomislav; Vukelić-Marković, Mirjana; Bogdanović, Zoran; Lukić, Anita; Brkljačić, Boris

Institutional repository: Repository of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine

Cite this document

Grgurević, I., Kujundžić, M., Banić, M., Kušec, R., Bokun, T., Vukelić Marković, M. ... Brkljačić, B. (2016). Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS. Abdominal Radiology, 41. (3), 476-484. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0596-4

Grgurević, Ivica, et al. "Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS." Abdominal Radiology, vol. 41, no. 3, 2016, pp. 476-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0596-4

Grgurević, Ivica, Milan Kujundžić, Marko Banić, Rajko Kušec, Tomislav Bokun, Mirjana Vukelić Marković, Zoran Bogdanović, Anita Lukić and Boris Brkljačić. "Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS." Abdominal Radiology 41, no. 3 (2016): 476-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0596-4

Grgurević, I., et al. (2016) 'Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS', Abdominal Radiology, 41(3), pp. 476-484. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0596-4

Grgurević I, Kujundžić M, Banić M, Kušec R, Bokun T, Vukelić Marković M, and sur.. Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS. Abdominal Radiology [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 November 22];41(3):476-484. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0596-4

I. Grgurević, et al., "Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS", Abdominal Radiology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 476-484, 2016. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138109. [Accessed: 22 November 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Subtypes and clinical significance of common bile duct varices in portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up by Doppler US and EUS
AuthorIvica Grgurević
MBZ: 325714
AuthorMilan Kujundžić
MBZ: 168490
AuthorMarko Banić
AuthorRajko Kušec
MBZ: 81895
AuthorTomislav Bokun
MBZ: 302356
AuthorMirjana Vukelić-Marković
AuthorZoran Bogdanović
MBZ: 202276
AuthorAnita Lukić
MBZ: 271740
AuthorBoris Brkljačić
MBZ: 175585
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Abstract (english)
PURPOSE: To investigate (1) diagnostic performance of transabdominal color doppler ultrasound (US) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for detection and sub-classification of common bile duct varices (CBDV) in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and (2) clinical significance and natural history of CBDV subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 4-year period, 56 patients with PVT underwent US and EUS for the presence and subtypes of CBDV. Natural history was analyzed for patients who attended control visits. RESULTS: CBDV were diagnosed in 57 and 59 % of patients with US and EUS, respectively. In 19 % of patients, EUS revealed different CBDV subtypes than previously seen by US. The most common were paracholedochal (PCV), while the least common were epicholedochal (ECV) and Submucosal varices (SMV). Nine patients had obstructive jaundice and underwent ERCP which was complicated by hemobilia in two patients with SMV. Among eight patients who underwent control EUS (median follow-up 60 months), the form of CBDV remained unchanged. Two patients bled from esophageal varices, both with ECV. CONCLUSION: While abdominal US and EUS are equally sensitive for detection of CBDV, EUS allows more precise determination of CBDV subtype. Patients with SMV might be at increased risk of bleeding upon ERCP.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleAbdominal Radiology
Numberingvol. 41, no. 3, pp. 476-484
p-ISSN2366-004X
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0596-4
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:138109
Publication2016
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/814424
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsRestricted access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-03-09 15:22:32