prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans
  Download
PDF 2 MB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (2022), 5; 2539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052539
Čandrlić, Marija; Tomas, Matej; Karl, Matej; Malešić, Lucija; Včev, Aleksandar; Perić Kačarević, Željka; Matijević, Marko

Institutional repository: Repository of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine

Cite this document

Čandrlić, M., Tomas, M., Karl, M., Malešić, L., Včev, A., Perić Kačarević, Ž. & Matijević, M. (2022). Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23. (5). doi: 10.3390/ijms23052539

Čandrlić, Marija, et al. "Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans." International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 5, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052539

Čandrlić, Marija, Matej Tomas, Matej Karl, Lucija Malešić, Aleksandar Včev, Željka Perić Kačarević and Marko Matijević. "Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052539

Čandrlić, M., et al. (2022) 'Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans', International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(5). doi: 10.3390/ijms23052539

Čandrlić M, Tomas M, Karl M, Malešić L, Včev A, Perić Kačarević Ž, and sur.. Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences [Internet]. 2022 February 25 [cited 2024 December 01];23(5). doi: 10.3390/ijms23052539

M. Čandrlić, et al., "Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans", International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 5, February 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:925206. [Accessed: 01 December 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans
AuthorMarija Čandrlić
AuthorMatej Tomas
AuthorMatej Karl
AuthorLucija Malešić
AuthorAleksandar Včev
AuthorŽeljka Perić Kačarević
AuthorMarko Matijević
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
(Department of Anatomy)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Dental Medicine
Abstract (english)
This study is the first histologic evaluation of an injectable biphasic calcium phosphate (IBCP) in humans six months after socket preservation according to the principles of guided bone regeneration. After tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge of 21 patients was augmented with IBCP (maxresorb® inject) in the test group, while 20 patients in the control group received a bovine xenograft (BX) (cerabone®). Six months after augmentation, a reentry procedure was performed to collect biopsies of regenerated bone for qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis. A total of 20 biopsies were taken for analysis. Qualitative histologic analysis showed complete integration of the biomaterial and no inflammatory tissue reaction, indicating the biocompatibility of the bone grafts and the surrounding tissue in both groups. Histomorphometric analysis showed comparable results in terms of newly formed bone (IBCP: 26.47 ± 14.71%, BX: 30.47 ± 16.39%) and residual biomaterial (IBCP: 13.1 ± 14.07%, BX: 17.89 ± 11.81%), with no significant difference found across groups (p > 0.05, Mann—Whitney U test). Statistical significance between groups was found in the result of soft tissue percentage (IBCP: 60.43 ± 12.73%, BX: 51.64 ± 14.63%, p = 0.046, Mann—Whitney U test). To conclude, IBCP and BX showed good osteoconductivity and biocompatibility with comparable new bone formation six months after alveolar ridge preservation.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
Numberingvol. 23, no. 5, 2539
e-ISSN1422-0067
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052539
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:925206
Publication2022-02-25
Document URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/5/2539
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) icon
Created on2022-03-21 17:06:39