Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Undergraduate Grade Point Average is a Poor Predictor of Scientific Productivity Later in Career
Collegium antropologicum, 34 (2010), S1; 1-5. urn:nbn:hr:184:570033


Cite this document

Polašek, O., Mavrinac, M., Jović, A., Džono Boban, A., Glivetić, T., Biočina Lukenda, D. ... Petrovečki, M. (2010). Undergraduate Grade Point Average is a Poor Predictor of Scientific Productivity Later in Career. Collegium antropologicum, 34. (S1), 1-5. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:570033

Polašek, Ozren, et al. "Undergraduate Grade Point Average is a Poor Predictor of Scientific Productivity Later in Career." Collegium antropologicum, vol. 34, no. S1, 2010, pp. 1-5. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:570033

Polašek, Ozren, Martina Mavrinac, Alan Jović, Ankica Džono Boban, Tatjana Glivetić, Dolores Biočina Lukenda, Ivan Vasilj and Mladen Petrovečki. "Undergraduate Grade Point Average is a Poor Predictor of Scientific Productivity Later in Career." Collegium antropologicum 34, no. S1 (2010): 1-5. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:570033

Polašek, O., et al. (2010) 'Undergraduate Grade Point Average is a Poor Predictor of Scientific Productivity Later in Career', Collegium antropologicum, 34(S1), pp. 1-5. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:570033 (Accessed 29 April 2024)

Polašek O, Mavrinac M, Jović A, Džono Boban A, Glivetić T, Biočina Lukenda D, and sur.. Undergraduate Grade Point Average is a Poor Predictor of Scientific Productivity Later in Career. Collegium antropologicum [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2024 April 29];34(S1):1-5. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:570033

O. Polašek, et al., "Undergraduate Grade Point Average is a Poor Predictor of Scientific Productivity Later in Career", Collegium antropologicum, vol. 34, no. S1, pp. 1-5, 2010. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:570033. [Accessed: 29 April 2024]