prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study
  Download
PDF 1.64 MB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study
Annals of Gastroenterology, 35 (2022), 6; 645-662. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2022.0753
Gkolfakis, Paraskevas; Petroneb, Maria Chiara; Tadić, Mario; Tziatziosa, Georgios; Karoumpalisd, Ioannis; Crinòe, Stefano Francesco; Facciorussof, Antonio; Hritzg, Istvan; Kypraiosh, Dimitrios; Sioulasi, Athanasios D.; Scotiniotisj, Ilias; Vezakisj, Antonios; Keczerg, Bank; Koukouliotia, Eleni; Muscatiellof, Nicola; Triantafylloua, Konstantinos; Polydorouj, Andreas; Grgurević, Ivica; Arcidiaconob, Paolo Giorgio; Papanikolaoua, Ioannis S. More authors...

Institutional repository: Dr Med - University of Zagreb School of Medicine Digital Repository

Cite this document

Gkolfakis, P., Petroneb, M. C., Tadić, M., Tziatziosa, G., Karoumpalisd, I., Crinòe, S. F. ... Papanikolaoua, I. S. (2022). Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study. Annals of Gastroenterology, 35. (6), 645-662. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0753

Gkolfakis, Paraskevas, et al. "Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study." Annals of Gastroenterology, vol. 35, no. 6, 2022, pp. 645-662. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2022.0753

Gkolfakis, Paraskevas, Maria Chiara Petroneb, Mario Tadić, Georgios Tziatziosa, Ioannis Karoumpalisd, Stefano Francesco Crinòe, Antonio Facciorussof, et al. "Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study." Annals of Gastroenterology 35, no. 6 (2022): 645-662. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2022.0753

Gkolfakis, P., et al. (2022) 'Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study', Annals of Gastroenterology, 35(6), pp. 645-662. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0753

Gkolfakis P, Petroneb MC, Tadić M, Tziatziosa G, Karoumpalisd I, Crinòe SF, and sur.. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study. Annals of Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 November 24];35(6):645-662. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0753

P. Gkolfakis, et al., "Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study", Annals of Gastroenterology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 645-662, 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:831849. [Accessed: 24 November 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective multicenter European study
AuthorParaskevas Gkolfakis
AuthorMaria Chiara Petroneb
AuthorMario Tadić
AuthorGeorgios Tziatziosa
AuthorIoannis Karoumpalisd
AuthorStefano Francesco Crinòe
AuthorAntonio Facciorussof
AuthorIstvan Hritzg
AuthorDimitrios Kypraiosh
AuthorAthanasios D. Sioulasi
AuthorIlias Scotiniotisj
AuthorAntonios Vezakisj
AuthorBank Keczerg
AuthorEleni Koukouliotia
AuthorNicola Muscatiellof
AuthorKonstantinos Triantafylloua
AuthorAndreas Polydorouj
AuthorIvica Grgurević
AuthorPaolo Giorgio Arcidiaconob
AuthorIoannis S. Papanikolaoua
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
(Department of Internal Medicine)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Internal Medicine
Abstract (english)
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage allows treatment of symptomatic peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) being the 2 most frequently used modalities. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PFC drainage in 10 European centers were retrospectively retrieved. Technical success (successful deployment), clinical success (satisfactory drainage), rate and type of early adverse events, drainage duration and complications on stent removal were evaluated. Results: A total of 128 patients-92 men (71.9%), age 57.2±11.9 years-underwent drainage, with pancreatic pseudocyst (PC) and walled-off necrosis (WON) in 92 (71.9%) and 36 (28.1%) patients, respectively. LAMS were used in 80 (62.5%) patients and DPPS in 48 (37.5%). Technical success was achieved in 124 (96.9%) of the cases, with no difference regarding either the type of stent (P>0.99) or PFC type (P=0.07). Clinical success was achieved in 119 (93%); PC had a better response than WON (91/92 vs. 28/36, P<0.001), but the type of stent did not affect the clinical success rate (P=0.29). Twenty patients (15.6%) had at least one early complication, with bleeding being the most common (n=7/20, 35%). No difference was detected in complication rate per type of stent (P=0.61) or per PFC type (P=0.1). Drainage duration was significantly longer with DPPS compared to LAMS: 88 (70-112) vs. 35 (29-55.3) days, P<0.001. Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage of PFCs achieves high percentages of technical and clinical success. Drainage using LAMS is of shorter duration, but the complication rate is similar between the 2 modalities.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleAnnals of Gastroenterology
Numberingvol. 35, no. 6, pp. 645-662
p-ISSN1792-7463
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2022.0753
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:831849
Publication2022
Document URLhttp://www.annalsgastro.gr/files/journals/1/earlyview/2022/ev-10-2022-05-AG_6817-0753.pdf
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) icon
Created on2023-07-11 07:34:20