prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career
  Download
PDF 62.48 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career
Collegium Antropologicum, 34 (2010), S. 1; 1-5. urn:nbn:hr:105:135678
Polašek, Ozren; Mavrinac, Martina; Jović, Alan; Džono Boban, Ankica; Biočina-Lukenda, Dolores; Glivetić, Tatjana; Vasilj, Ivan; Petrovečki, Mladen

Institutional repository: Dr Med - University of Zagreb School of Medicine Digital Repository

Cite this document

Polašek, O., Mavrinac, M., Jović, A., Džono Boban, A., Biočina Lukenda, D., Glivetić, T. ... Petrovečki, M. (2010). Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career . Collegium Antropologicum, 34. (S. 1), 1-5. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:135678

Polašek, Ozren, et al. "Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career ." Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 34, no. S. 1, 2010, pp. 1-5. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:135678

Polašek, Ozren, Martina Mavrinac, Alan Jović, Ankica Džono Boban, Dolores Biočina Lukenda, Tatjana Glivetić, Ivan Vasilj and Mladen Petrovečki. "Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career ." Collegium Antropologicum 34, no. S. 1 (2010): 1-5. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:135678

Polašek, O., et al. (2010) 'Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career ', Collegium Antropologicum, 34(S. 1), pp. 1-5. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:135678 (Accessed 30 April 2024)

Polašek O, Mavrinac M, Jović A, Džono Boban A, Biočina Lukenda D, Glivetić T, and sur.. Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career . Collegium Antropologicum [Internet]. 2010 March [cited 2024 April 30];34(S. 1):1-5. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:135678

O. Polašek, et al., "Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career ", Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 34, no. S. 1, pp. 1-5, March 2010. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:135678. [Accessed: 30 April 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Undergraduate grade point average is a poor predictor of scientific productivity later in career
Title (croatian)Prosjek ocjena diplomskog studija je loš prediktor znanstvene produktivnosti u karijeri
AuthorOzren Polašek
AuthorMartina Mavrinac
AuthorAlan Jović
AuthorAnkica Džono Boban
AuthorDolores Biočina-Lukenda
AuthorTatjana Glivetić
AuthorIvan Vasilj
AuthorMladen Petrovečki
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Pedagogy
Abstract (english)
The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the undergraduate grade point average in prediction of scientific production of research trainees during their fellowship and later in career. The study was performed in 1,320 research trainees whose fellowships from the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports were terminated between 1999 and 2005. The data were analyzed using logistic regression. The results indicated that undergraduate grade point average was negatively associated with scientific productivity both during and after the fellowship termination. Other indicators, such as undergraduate scientific productivity exhibited much stronger positive association with scientific productivity later in career and should be given more weight in candidate selection process in science and research.
Abstract (croatian)
Cilj ovog rada bio je istražiti mogućnost korištenja prosjeka ocjena diplomskog studija kao pokazatelja znanstvene produktivnosti za vrijeme trajanja znanstvenog novaštva i nakon završetka novaštva. Rad je proveden na ukupno 1 320 znanstvenih novaka, čija je potpora Ministarstva znanosti, obrazovanja i športa završila između 1999 i 2005. godine. Podaci su analizirani logističkom regresijom. Rezultati su ukazivali na to da je prosjek ocjena diplomskog studija bio negativno povezan sa znanstvenom produktivnošću i za vrijeme novaštva i nakon završetka novaštva. Drugi pokazatelji, poput znanstvene aktivnosti tijekom diplomskog studija su bili mnogo snažnije povezani sa znanstvenom produktivnošću tijekom i nakon završetka novaštva. Ovo je pokazatelj kojem bi se trebalo pridavati više pažnje na natječajima za izbor znanstvenih novaka.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleCollegium Antropologicum
Numberingvol. 34, no. S. 1, pp. 1-5
p-ISSN0350-6134
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:135678
Publication2010-03
Document URLhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/51715
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-03-28 11:45:12