prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population
  Download
PDF 143.29 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population
International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 111 (2010), 1; 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011
Matijević, Ratko; Grgić, Ozren; Knežević, Mario

Institutional repository: Dr Med - University of Zagreb School of Medicine Digital Repository

Cite this document

Matijević, R., Grgić, O. & Knežević, M. (2010). Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 111. (1), 41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011

Matijević, Ratko, et al. "Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population." International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 111, no. 1, 2010, pp. 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011

Matijević, Ratko, Ozren Grgić and Mario Knežević. "Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population." International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 111, no. 1 (2010): 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011

Matijević, R., Grgić, O. and Knežević, M. (2010) 'Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population', International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 111(1), pp. 41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011

Matijević R, Grgić O, Knežević M. Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics [Internet]. 2010 July 07 [cited 2024 June 09];111(1):41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011

R. Matijević, O. Grgić and M. Knežević, "Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population", International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 41-44, July 2010. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:868630. [Accessed: 09 June 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population
AuthorRatko Matijević
AuthorOzren Grgić
AuthorMario Knežević
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Abstract (english)
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of a sign of bacterial vaginosis and a sign of cervical insufficiency in predicting preterm labor (PTL, occurring in the 37th week or earlier) and early PTL (occurring in the 34th week or earlier) in a low-risk cohort of 316 pregnant women. ----- METHOD: Vaginal pH was assessed using test gloves and cervical length (CL) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound. A pH value less than 5.0 (the 95th-percentile threshold) and a CL greater than 26 mm (the 5th-percentile threshold) were considered normal. ----- RESULTS: There were 14 participants (4.4%) with an elevated vaginal pH and 15 (4.7%) with a shortened CL. The incidence of PTL (<37 weeks) was 7.2%, while incidence of early PTL (≤34 weeks) was 2.5%. A shortened CL was significantly correlated with PTL (likelihood ratio [LR] weighted by prevalence; 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.7) but not with early PTL (LR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4-1.8). An elevated vaginal pH was a better predictor of PTL (LR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3-10.4) and early PTL (LR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1). ----- CONCLUSION: An elevated vaginal pH was a better predictor of early PTL than a shortened CL in this cohort of pregnant women at low risk.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionAccepted version
Journal titleInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Numberingvol. 111, no. 1, pp. 41-44
p-ISSN0020-7292
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:868630
Publication2010-07-07
Document URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-03-28 11:57:47