prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora
  Download
PDF 472.85 KB
master's thesis
Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora
Split: University of Split, School of Medicine, 2022. urn:nbn:hr:171:942477
Bogić, Jure
University of Split
School of Medicine

Institutional repository: MEFST Repository

Cite this document

Bogić, J. (2022). Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora (Master's thesis). Split: University of Split, School of Medicine. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:942477

Bogić, Jure. "Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora." Master's thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, 2022. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:942477

Bogić, Jure. "Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora." Master's thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, 2022. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:942477

Bogić, J. (2022). 'Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora', Master's thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, accessed 26 December 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:942477

Bogić J. Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora [Master's thesis]. Split: University of Split, School of Medicine; 2022 [cited 2024 December 26] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:942477

J. Bogić, "Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora", Master's thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, Split, 2022. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:942477

Metadata
TitleKvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih istraživanja o terapiji bora
Title (english)The reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials on wrinkles
AuthorJure Bogić
MentorJosipa Bukić (mentor)
Committee memberDoris Rušić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberAna Šešelja Perišin (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberJosipa Bukić (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Split
School of Medicine
Split
Defense date and country2022, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Pharmacy
Pharmacy
Abstract
Cilj: Cilj ovog istraživanja je utvrditi kvalitetu sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja koja ispituju učinkovitost proizvoda u terapiji bora. Materijal i metode: Obavljena je PubMed pretraga svih randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja na temu bora objavljenih između 2017. i 2022. godine. Sažetci su pretraživani koristeći ključnu riječ „wrinkles“, a uključeni su svi kojima je bio dostupan sažetak te su bili na engleskom jeziku. Pretraživanje je obavljeno u kolovozu 2022. Kako bi se ocijenila kvaliteta sažetaka uključenih ispitivanja korišten je CONSORT alat koji sadrži sedamnaest stavki. Rezultati: Pubmed pretraga rezultirala je sa 350 sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja, od kojih je izuzeto 58. Medijan ukupnog zbroja svih stavki CONSORT liste bio je 7 ( interval pouzdanosti 6-7) za ukupni promatrani period. Najveća zabilježena vrijednost bila je 12 od ukupno 17 stavki koje bi prema CONSORT-u sažetak trebao sadržavati. Ni jedan sažetak nije imao svih 17 stavki navedenih u sažetku te podatke o financiranju istraživanja. Najmanje su dostupne informacije o financiranju, randomizaciji i podaci o ispitanicima. Zaključak: Kvaliteta sažetaka randomiziranih kontroliranih kliničkih istraživanja o terapiji bora je niska.
Abstract (english)
Objectives: To analyze the quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials on wrinkles available on PubMed using the CONSORT checklist. Material and methods: A PubMed search of all randomized controlled clinical trials on wrinkles published between 2017 and 2022 was performed. Abstracts were searched using the term „wrinkles“. Criteria of inclusion was available abstract and English language. The search was performed in August 2022. In order to evaluate the quality of the abstracts of the included trials, the CONSORT checklist containing seventeen items was used. Results: A PubMed search resulted in 350 abstracts of randomized controlled clinical trails, of which 58 were excluded. The median of the total sum of items from the CONSORT checklist was 7 ( confidence interval 6-7) for the entire observed period. The highest recorded value was 12 items out of a total of 17 that, according to CONSORT checklist, an abstract should contain. Not a single abstract had all of the 17 items listed in the abstract and data on the research funding. The least available information is about research funding, randomization and data on research participants. Conclusion: The quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials on wrinkles is low.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:171:942477
Study programmeTitle: Pharmacy
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra farmacije (magistar/magistra farmacije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-09-15 08:05:30