Title Hearing recognition comparison between aided and unaided ear in hearing aid users
Title (croatian) Usporedba slušne razabirljivosti potpomognutog i nepotpomognutog uha kod korisnika slušnog pomagala
Author Hakon Lohne
Mentor Petar Drviš (mentor)
Committee member Zenon Pogorelić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee member Mirko Kontić (član povjerenstva)
Committee member Nikola Kolja Poljak (član povjerenstva)
Granter University of Split School of Medicine (Otorhinolaryngology) Split
Defense date and country 2019-09-10, Croatia
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE Clinical Medical Sciences Otorhinolaryngology
Abstract Title: HEARING RECOGNITION COMPARISON BETWEEN AIDED AND UNAIDED EAR IN HEARING AID USERS
Objectives: The main goal of the present study is to investigate the difference of hearing recognition between the aided and unaided ear in long-term (>5 years) single-sided hearing aid users with moderate and severe hearing loss.
Subjects and methods: In our study we observed 48 subjects with bilateral hearing loss > 40 dB, 31 males and 17 females. All subjects were unilateral hearing aid users for at least 5 years. This retrospective study was carried out from January 2018 until June 2018 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Split. All patients underwent otoscopy, pure-tone audiometry and speech audiometry in a soundproof room. Frequencies from 250 Hz to 8000 Hz were tested with increasing intensity. Pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated as average of hearing sensitivity at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. All subjects undertook investigation of speech audiometry: speech recognition threshold (SRT; lowest intensity disyllabic words that an individual can repeat at least 50% of the time), PB50 (performance-intensity on phonemically balanced words where 50% of speech is recognized), PBmax (performance-intensity maximum on phonemically balanced words; 100% of speech is recognized). The patients were divided in accordance to classification of moderate or severe hearing loss into 2 groups.
Results: We found no statistically significant difference in pure-tone audiometry between aided and unaided ear (P=0.09). In subjects with SHL we found statistically significant difference between aided and unaided ear in SRT (P =0.005), PBmax (P=0.009) and PB50 (P=0.019). In subject with MHL we found no statistically significant difference between aided and unaided ear in SRT (P=0.938), PBmax (=0.644) and PB50 (P=0.612).
Conclusion: In our study we show that in subjects with SHL, there is a statistically significant improvement in speech audiometry in the aided ear amongst long term (>5 years) hearing aid users compared to the unaided ear, likely due to increased plasticity of the hearing pathway due to the use of hearing aids. We do not see a similar significant difference in the patients with MHL. Our study has shown that the greater the hearing loss, the greater the benefit of using a hearing aid; this is manifested in the improvement of speech audiometry in long term hearing aid users.
Abstract (croatian) Ciljevi: Glavni je cilj ove studije istražiti razliku slušne razabirljivosti između potpomognutog i nepotpomognutog uha kod dugoročnih (>5 godina) jednostranih korisnika slušnog pomagala s umjerenom i teškom nagluhošću.
Ispitanici i metode: U našem istraživanju ispitali smo 48 ispitanika s bilateralnim gubitkom sluha > 40 dB, 31 muškarac i 17 žena. Svi su ispitanici bili jednostrani korisnici slušnih pomagala najmanje 5 godina. Ova retrospektivna studija provedena je od siječnja 2018. do lipnja 2018. godine na Klinici za otorinolaringologiju s kirurgijom glave i vrata, Klinički bolnički centar Split. Svi ispitanici bili su podvrgnuti otoskopiji te tonskoj i govornoj audiometriji u zvučno izoliranoj sobi. Frekvencije od 250 Hz do 8000 Hz testirane su s postupnim pojačavanjem intenziteta. Prosječni prag sluha (PTA) izračunat je kao prosjek praga sluha na 500, 1000, 2000 i 4000 Hz. Kod svih ispitanika učinjena je govorna audiometrija s parametrima: prag slušne razabirljivosti (SRT; disilabične riječi najmanjeg intenziteta koje pojedinac može ponoviti najmanje 50% vremena), PB50 (intenzitet na fonemski uravnoteženim riječima gdje je prepoznato 50% govora), PBmax (maksimum intenziteta na fonemski uravnoteženim riječima; prepoznaje se 100% govora). Bolesnici su podijeljeni u skladu s klasifikacijom umjerene i teške nagluhosti u 2 skupine.
Rezultati: Nismo pronašli statistički značajnu razliku u tonskoj audiometriji između potpomognutog i nepotpomognutog uha kod jednostranih dugoročnih korisnika slušnog pomagala (P= 0,09). U skupini ispitanika s teškom nagluhošću otkrili smo statistički značajnu razliku između potpomognutog i nepotpomognutog uha u SRT (P = 0,005), PBmax (P = 0,009) i PB50 (P = 0,019). U skupini ispitanika s umjerenom nagluhošću nismo pronašli statistički značajnu razliku između potpomognutog i nepotpomognutog uha u SRT (p = 0,938), PBmax (P = 0,644) i PB50 (P = 0,612).
Zaključak: U našem istraživanju pokazali smo da kod ispitanika s teškom nagluhošću dolazi do statistički značajnog poboljšanja u rezultatima govorne audiometrije na potpomognuom uhu, u usporedbi s nepotpomognutim uhom, kod dugoročnih jednostranih korisnika slušnog pomagala, vjerojatno zbog povećane plastičnosti slušnog puta kod korisnika slušnih pomagala. Statistički značajnu razliku ne nalazimo kod bolesnika s umjerenom nagluhošću.
Keywords
Hearing Loss
Hearing Aids
Hearing Tests
Keywords (croatian)
Gubitak sluha
Slušna pomagala
Testovi sluha
Language english
URN:NBN urn:nbn:hr:171:549152
Study programme Title: Medical Studies in English Study programme type: university Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate Academic / professional title: doktor/doktorica medicine (doktor/doktorica medicine)
Type of resource Text
File origin Born digital
Access conditions Open access
Terms of use
Created on 2019-11-21 16:02:12