The paper analyses the impact of enforcement law rules on the ability of an object to serve as a liened property, and through the analysis of the existing legislative framework de lege lata, as well as through the lens of case-law, it tries to answer the question whether the existing legal regulation is satisfactory from the aspect of the possibility of the lien creditor to successfully settle his claim through enforcement procedure. A lien, as an instrument of real legal security of a creditor's claim, serves to ensure that a certain obligation, if not performed on maturity, will be to settled against the value of the liened property. Involuntary settlement of the claim secured by the lien is carried out according to the real legal rules and in the modality laid down in the regulations governing the enforcement of monetary claims. In order to understand the institute of lien, its possibilities and limitations, as well as ability to adequtely protect rights and interests of the parties in the procedure, it is necessary to be familiar with the rules of both systems involved, real and enforcement law. The rules of real law prescribe the prerequisites that a certain object must meet in order to have the ability to serve as a liened property. However, these rules are of a general nature and yet do not provide a sufficient guarantee that the creditor will successfully settle his claim secured by the lien. The rules of enforcement law regarding exclusion, exemption and limitation of enforcement impose important restrictions that significantly limit the possibility of settlement against the object on which a lien has been validly established.