prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava
  Download
PDF 1.07 MB
master's thesis
Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava
Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, 2023. urn:nbn:hr:199:802340
Ikić, David
University of Zagreb
Faculty of Law
Criminal Procedural Law

Institutional repository: Repository Faculty of Law University of Zagreb

Cite this document

Ikić, D. (2023). Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava (Master's thesis). Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:199:802340

Ikić, David. "Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava." Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:199:802340

Ikić, David. "Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava." Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:199:802340

Ikić, D. (2023). 'Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava', Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, accessed 20 December 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:199:802340

Ikić D. Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava [Master's thesis]. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law; 2023 [cited 2024 December 20] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:199:802340

D. Ikić, "Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava", Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, Zagreb, 2023. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:199:802340

Metadata
TitleNačelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava
Title (english)Principle ne bis in idem in the recent jurisprudence of the European Court for Human Rights
AuthorDavid Ikić
MentorZoran Burić (mentor)
Committee memberZoran Burić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberMarin Bonačić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberElizabeta Ivičević Karas (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Zagreb
Faculty of Law
(Criminal Procedural Law)
Zagreb
Defense date and country2023-09-11, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Abstract
Cilj ovog rada bio je prikazati aktivnost Europskog suda za ljudska prava pri tumačenju načela ne bis in idem u razdoblju od 2018. do 2023. godine. U radu se sažeto prikazuju kriteriji koje je Sud razvio u ocjeni pojedinih elemenata ne bis in idem načela u svojoj prethodnoj praksi, a zaključno s presudom A. i B. protiv Norveške, te način na koji ih je primjenjivao u recentnim presudama. Analiziraju se slučajevi u kojima je Sud ponovio dosadašnja shvaćanja u ovom području, ali i oni u kojima je po prvi put primijenio načelo u novom kontekstu. Načelo se razmatra kroz analizu pitanja kaznenopravne naravi postupka, postojanja istog djela i dupliciranja postupka te se razmatraju neke od dvojbi koje su nastale u recentnoj praksi. Rad se zaključuje prikazom tumačenja Suda u pogledu pojma pravomoćne osuđujuće i oslobađajuće odluke te se analiziraju predmeti u kojima je Sud odlučivao o postojanju iznimki od primjene predmetnog načela.
Abstract (english)
The aim of this paper was to show the activity of the European Court of human rights in interpreting the principle of ne bis in idem in the period from 2018 until 2023. The paper summarises the criteria developed by the court in assessing certain elements of the ne bis in idem principle in its previous case-law, up until its case of A and B v. Norway, and the manner in which the Court applied them in its recent judgments. It analyses cases in which the court has reiterated its current understanding in this area, but also those cases in which it applied the principle for the first time in a new context. The principle is considered through the analysis of the issues of the criminal nature of the procedure, the existence of the same offence and duplication of the proceedings. In addition, some of the doubts that have arisen in recent practice are considered. The paper concludes with a presentation of the court's interpretation of the concept of final judgment and acquittal and analyses the cases in which the court decided on the existence of exceptions to the application of the principle in question.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:199:802340
Study programmeTitle: Law
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-09-18 10:53:09