prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku
Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2020. urn:nbn:hr:132:013569
Gabrić, Damir
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
Chair of Criminal Law

Institutional repository: Repository of Faculty of Law in Osijek

Cite this document

Gabrić, D. (2020). Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku (Master's thesis). Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:013569

Gabrić, Damir. "Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2020. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:013569

Gabrić, Damir. "Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2020. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:013569

Gabrić, D. (2020). 'Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, accessed 25 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:013569

Gabrić D. Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku [Master's thesis]. Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek; 2020 [cited 2024 November 25] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:013569

D. Gabrić, "Sporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, Osijek, 2020. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:013569

Metadata
TitleSporazumijevanje stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku
Title (english)Plea bargaining in croatian criminal procedure
AuthorDamir Gabrić
MentorAnte Novokmet (mentor)
Committee memberIgor Vuletić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberZvonimir Tomičić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberAnte Novokmet (član povjerenstva)
GranterJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
(Chair of Criminal Law)
Osijek
Defense date and country2020-07-08, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Criminology and Victimology
Abstract
Ovaj rad bavi se sporazumijevanjem stranaka u kaznenom postupku, s naglaskom na sporazumijevanje u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku. Ukratko se obrazlažu i neka komparativna rješenja, odnosno američko, njemačko, talijansko, kao i Preporuka Vijeća Europe R(87)18 iz 1987. Zemlja podrijetla ovog kazneno procesnog instituta su SAD. Sporazumijevanje predstavlja relativno nov institut u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku, pa su stoga izazovi i kontroverze još uvijek poprilično aktualne. U postupku povodom sporazumijevanja ne iscrpljuju se sva zakonska rješenja koja se inače iscrpljuju kad se provodi postupak bez sporazumijevanja ili izdavanja kaznenog naloga. Položaj suda, kao tijela koje ima ili bi trebalo imati svoj ugled i autoritet povodom donošenja odluka, u ovakvom postupanju doveden je u pitanje. Stranke, a u neku ruku i oštećenici odnosno žrtve kaznenog djela, u određenoj mjeri gube svoja prvotna obilježja koja imaju u redovitom kaznenom postupku. Ustavna jednakost građana pred državnim tijelom, također bi mogla biti narušena zbog mogućeg arbitrarnog postupanja tijela čija je zadaća progon počinitelja kaznenih djela
Abstract (english)
This diploma paper deal with plea bargaining in criminal procedure, emphasizing on croatian criminal procedure. There are, shortly explained some solutions in comparative law, specifically American, German, Italian and also the Recommendation of Council of Europe R(87)18 from 1987. Origin state of this criminal procedure institute are US. Plea bargaining presents relatively new institute in croatian criminal procedure, so therefore are challenges and controversies still pretty much actual. There are not all legal solutions consummated in the procedure raised for plea bargaining, which are consummated in the normal criminal procedure which is proceeded without plea bargaining or penalty order. Position of court, as an organ of state which should has own reputations and authority as a legal decision maker, is in this acting brought in doubt. Parties and in some case also victims or damaged persons, lose their primar characteristics which they have in normal criminal procedure. Equality proclaimed by Constitution in front of states organs, could be also damaged because of possible arbitrary acting of prosecution organs.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:132:013569
Study programmeTitle: Law
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-04-06 16:18:24