prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova
Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2017. urn:nbn:hr:132:152683
Homolka, Sanela
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
Chair of Commercial Law

Institutional repository: Repository of Faculty of Law in Osijek

Cite this document

Homolka, S. (2017). Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova (Master's thesis). Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:152683

Homolka, Sanela. "Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2017. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:152683

Homolka, Sanela. "Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2017. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:152683

Homolka, S. (2017). 'Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, accessed 29 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:152683

Homolka S. Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova [Master's thesis]. Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek; 2017 [cited 2024 November 29] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:152683

S. Homolka, "Arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, Osijek, 2017. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:152683

Metadata
TitleArbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja trgovačkih sporova
Title (english)Arbitration as Alternative Method of Resolving Commercial Disputes
AuthorSanela Homolka
MentorDubravka Akšamović (mentor)
Committee memberMirela Župan (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberPredrag Zima (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberDubravka Akšamović (član povjerenstva)
GranterJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
(Chair of Commercial Law)
Osijek
Defense date and country2017-07-18, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Commercial and Company Law
Abstract
Predmet ovog diplomsko rada jeste arbitraža kao izvansudski postupak kojim stranke rješavaju svoje sporove proizišle iz ugovornih i izvanugovornih odnosa. Rad se temelji na Zakonu o arbitraži kao nacionalnom kodificiranom aktu koji uređuje domaću arbitražu, tj. onu koja ima sjedište na teritoriju Republike Hrvatske. Obzirom na to da su stranke slobodne u izboru mjerodavnog kako procesnog tako i materijalnog prava, naglašavaju se najvažnije razlike u normiranju pojedinih instituta i procesnih pravila u odnosu na međunarodnopravne izvore arbitražnog prava. Iako je Zakon o arbitraži na snazi nešto manje od 16 godina i dalje postoje velika razmimoilaženja glede tumačenja pojedinih odredbi što dovodi i do konfuzije glede osnovnih obilježja arbitraže, npr. mogućnost ulaganja pravnih lijekova, kako u javnosti tako i među pravnim stručnjacima. Iz tog je razloga posebna pažnja posvećena tim pitanjima oslanjajući se na tumačenje pravnih teoretičara i praksu Ustavnog suda koji, mogli bi slobodno reći revolucionarnim stavovima, dovodi u pitanje neovisnost arbitraže u odnosu na nacionalni pravni poredak.
Abstract (english)
The subject of this diploma work is arbitration as an out-of-court procedure whereby the parties resolve their disputes arising out of contractual and extraterritorial relations. The work is based on the Act on Arbitration as a nationally codified act regulating domestic arbitration, that is, the one based on the territory of the Republic of Croatia. Given that the parties are free in the choice of both procedural and substantive law, the most important differences in the standardization of individual institutes and procedural rules are emphasized in relation to international legal sources of arbitral law. Although the Arbitration Act is in force for less than 16 years, there is still considerable disagreement over the interpretation of certain provisions, leading to confusion about the basic features of arbitration, such as the possibility of investing in remedies, both in the public and among legal professionals. For this reason special attention is devoted to these issues, relying on the interpretation of the legal theorists and the practice of the Supreme court, which could freely say revolutionary attitudes, questions the independence of arbitration in relation to the national legal order.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:132:152683
Study programmeTitle: Law
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2018-01-31 12:51:13