| Abstract (croatian) | Teorija i praksa ukazuje na to da prijedlozi za otvaranje stečajnog postupka, pogotovu oni koji uključuju velike poslovne subjekte s mnogo radnika, imaju veliku mogućnost privući pažnju medija. Nažalost, većina medija, kao i šira javnost, ne shvaćaju složenost stečajnog postupka i njegovih implikacija na društveno-ekonomske odnose. Problem proizlazi iz raznolikosti ciljeva koji nastanu pokretanjem stečajne procedure, ali i iz činjenice da efikasni stečajni postupak treba ostvariti mnoge, ne često kompatibilne, ciljeve. Šira javnost će, vjerojatno, promatrati otvaranje stečaja i ulazak stečajnih upravitelja u trgovačka društva kao neposredni uzrok zatvaranja poslovnih subjekata, otpuštanja radnika, nerijetko percipirajući sve navedeno kroz prijevarno ponašanje itd., ne shvaćajući pritom da je problem, zapravo, insolventnost, a da je rješenje tog problema stečajni postupak, kao i postupak predstečajne nagodbe i financijskog restrukturiranja. Stoga, u nastavku rada, cilj je analizirati odnos (tijela) stečajnog postupka i medija. Polazna teza, štoviše i osnovno pravilo u svezi s odnosom stečaj-mediji je zapravo opće pravilo i može se sažeti u sljedeće - mediji imaju pravo istraživati stajališta o svim događajima, pojavama, osobama, predmetima i djelatnostima u svezi sa stečajevima, no, imaju i dužnost provjeravati istinitost činjenica o kojima pišu te poštivati privatnost, dostojanstvo, ugled i čast tijela stečajnog postupka, a nakladnik treba voditi računa da objavljenom informacijom ne nanosi drugome štetu jer u protivnom, u smislu odredaba Zakona o medijima (NN, br. 59/04. i 84/11. – dalje: ZM) odgovara za štetu koja je takvim propuštanjem nastala (arg. Vrhovni sud Republike Hrvatske, Rev-1261/97 od 29. kolovoza 2001.). |
| Abstract (english) | Both theory and practice show that suggestions for starting a bankruptcy proceedings, especially the ones for big business entities with a lot of employees, attract media. Unfortunately, majority of media and general public do not understand the complexity of bankruptcy proceedings and its implications on social-economic relations.The problem arises not only from diversity of goals that emerge in opening of bankruptcy proceeding but also from the fact that effective bankruptcy proceedings should execute many goals that are rarely compatible. General public will probably consider the starting of bankruptcy proceedings and bankruptcy estate managers in companies as an immediate cause for closing down of the businesses, dismissal, often perceiving it as an imposture and so on but without realizing that a real problem is insolvency and without understanding that the solution to the problem are the bankruptcy proceeding, bankruptcy settlement and financial restructuring. Furtheron, the paper aims at analysis of the relation between bankruptcy proceedings (body) and media. The initial thesis and a general rule regarding the bankruptcy-media relation, is actually a general rule and can be summarized into the following thesis – media have right to investigate the points of view of all events, appearances, persons, cases and activities concerning bankruptcy but they also have duty to check for authentic facts they are writing about and also respect privacy, dignity, reputation and dignity of a bankruptcy procedure body; the publisher should care that the published information should not do harm to anyone since pursuant to provisions of the Media Law (Official Gazette, No. 59/04 and 84/11) he shall be responsible for the damage caused (Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia, Rev-1261/97 of 29 August 2001). |
