| Abstract | Rad se bavi ulogom punomoćnika u parničnom postupku, no za razmatranje njegove uloge potrebno je prethodno poznavati općenito institut punomoćnika. Zato se u ovom radu započinje s opisivanjem razvoja instituta punomoćnika i potrebe za njegovim osnivanjem. Navodi se definicija punomoćnika, osnove na temelju kojih on ima ovlaštenje za zastupanje stranke i obrazlaže se pojedinačno tko sve može biti punomoćnik. On je zastupnik stranke, dakle osoba (iznimno tijelo) koja uime i za račun zastupane stranke poduzima radnje u postupku i prema kojoj (iznimno kojemu) drugi procesni subjekti poduzimaju radnje s izravnim učinkom prema toj stranci koju (iznimno kojeg) je za zastupanje ovlastila sama parnično sposobna fizička osoba kao stranka ili organ zastupnik parnično sposobne pravne osobe ili drugoga parnično sposobnog entiteta kao stranke, to jest zakonski zastupnik parnično nesposobne stranke. Novelom 2003. godine znatno je sužen izbor punomoćnika jer u pravilu to može biti samo odvjetnik, no predviđene su iznimke kada to mogu biti i neke druge osobe poput osoba koje su u radnom odnosu sa strankom koju zastupaju. Pri razjašnjavanju činjenice tko sve može biti punomoćnik navode se i njegove uloge u postupku te njegova ovlaštenja i dužnosti pri zastupanju stranke. Opisane su i vrste punomoći koje se razlikuju s obzirom na opseg punomoći na koji stranka ovlašćuje punomoćnika. Stranka može punomoćnika ovlastiti na poduzimanje svih ili samo pojedinih radnji u postupku. Također, navode se procesne radnje punomoćnika i potreba njihova usklađivanja s radnjama stranke u svrhu izbjegavanja nesuglasnosti njihovih radnji. Opisano je kako nastaje punomoć i pretpostavke koje moraju biti ispunjene u svrhu njezine pravilnosti. Spominju se razlozi prestanka punomoći uz pobliže objašnjenje svakoga. Naposljetku, govori se o odgovornosti punomoćnika putem odredbi Zakona o obveznim odnosima kojima se uređuje ugovor o nalogu te prava koja punomoćnik ima u odnosu na stranku koju zastupa, na sud, protivne stranke i druge sudionike u postupku. |
| Abstract (english) | This master’s thesis is based on role of the attorney in a civil action, but to answer and consider that question, it is necessary to be previously acquainted with the general institute of an attorney. Therefore, this paper initially starts by describing the evolution of the institute of an attorney and the need to establish such an institute. The definition of an attorney is stated, the basis on which he is authorized to represent a party and the general and the specific definition of who can be an attorney is also stated. An attorney is the representative of a party, therefore, a person, (an exceptional body) who on the behalf and the will of the represented party takes action in the process, and towards whom (exceptionally to whom) other process subjects take action with direct effect towards that party, which (exceptionally to whom) to give representation, has given the authorization of the person capable of litigation, a physical person functioning as a party or an organ representative competent of litigation or other entities capable of litigation as a party, that is, a legal representative of a litigation incapable party. A novel from 2003 has significantly narrowed the choice of an attorney, since generally it can only be a lawyer, but such exceptions are foreseen when it can be a different kind of a person, such as people who are in an employment with a party they are representing. When clarifying who can be an attorney, their role in the procedure is also described, and their authorisations and duties while representing a party. The types of authorisations are described, which differ depending on the extent of the authorization which the party provides. The party can authorize an attorney to take every, or only specific actions in the procedure. Also, attorney’s procedural actions are also stated, and the need to synchronize their actions with their party with the need to avoid disagreements with their actions. It is described how authorizations are provided and the presumptions they have to fulfill to have the power of attorney be done properly. The reasons to cease the power of attorney are also covered in detail. Ultimately, the responsibility of the power of attorney are mentioned through regulations of the Law of mandatory relations which are used to edit the mandate agreement, and rights the power of attorney has in relation to the party he represents, the court, the opposing party and the other participants in the process. |
