The loss of teeth in the mouth causes negative consequences for the stomatognathic system, the aesthetic appearance of the face and disrupts the function of chewing. This is why it is important to replace lost teeth as soon as possible. They can be replaced with a conventional prosthetic or implantoprosthetic prosthesis. For successful implantoprosthetic therapy it is essential to carry out diagnostic procedures and precise therapy planning. The position of the placed implant plays a big role in the success of the implantation and the functional durability of implantoprosthetic therapy. Because of that surgical guides are increasingly in use. In the process of planning surgical guides, the design and the shape of the prosthetic is determined first, and the position of the implant in bone second. Such backward planning concept ensures the placement of the implant in an ideal prosthetic position. Guided implant surgery proved to be a more precise technique compared to free-hand implantation. This paper presents the case of implantation of two implants at position 36 and 46. The socket for the implant at position 36 was prepared using the guided implant surgery, and for the implant 46 using the free-hand implant surgery. Using an intraoral scan and a CBCT image, prosthetically driven positions for implant placement were planned. The measurements made after the implants were placed confirmed that implant 36 was in a prosthetically better position compared to the implant 46. After the completion of the osseointegration period, zirconium oxide crowns were made.