prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals
  Download
PDF 333.1 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals
International Endodontic Journal, 52 (2018), 1; 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12985
Bago, I.; Suk, M.; Katić, M.; Gabrić, D.; Anić, I.

Institutional repository: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine Repository

Cite this document

Bago, I., Suk, M., Katić, M., Gabrić, D. & Anić, I. (2018). Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals. International Endodontic Journal, 52. (1), 105-113. doi: 10.1111/iej.12985

Bago, I., et al. "Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals." International Endodontic Journal, vol. 52, no. 1, 2018, pp. 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12985

Bago, I., M. Suk, M. Katić, D. Gabrić and I. Anić. "Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals." International Endodontic Journal 52, no. 1 (2018): 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12985

Bago, I., et al. (2018) 'Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals', International Endodontic Journal, 52(1), pp. 105-113. doi: 10.1111/iej.12985

Bago I, Suk M, Katić M, Gabrić D, Anić I. Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals. International Endodontic Journal [Internet]. 2018 July 25 [cited 2025 February 17];52(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/iej.12985

I. Bago, M. Suk, M. Katić, D. Gabrić and I. Anić, "Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals", International Endodontic Journal, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 105-113, July 2018. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:127:041911. [Accessed: 17 February 2025]

Metadata
Title (english)Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta‐percha and an epoxy resin‐based sealer from straight root canals
AuthorI. Bago
AuthorM. Suk
AuthorM. Katić
AuthorD. Gabrić
AuthorI. Anić
Author's institution(Zagreb University Hispital Center)
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Dental Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Dental Medicine
Abstract (english)
Aim: To compare the Reciproc Blue, Reciproc and ProTaper Universal Retreatment systems with regard to the effective removal of epoxy resin-based sealer and gutta-percha during the retreatment of oval, straight root canals. Methodology: Forty-five extracted, human mandibular first premolars with single straight oval canals were selected on the basis of cone beam computed tomography evaluations. The root canals were instrumented with the ProTaper Next system up to the X2 file, and filled with gutta-percha and epoxy resin-based sealer using the cold lateral condensation technique. After 1 month, the samples were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) according to the retreatment system used: Reciproc Blue R40, Reciproc R40 and ProTaper Universal. The specimens were scanned at the resolution of 1.2 μm by a microcomputed tomography device after the root filling and retreatment procedures, and the decrease in the volume of filling material after each retreatment protocol was measured. The results were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and additional box-and-whisker plots. Results: Although the volume of the filling material decreased significantly in all three groups (P < 0.05), none of the systems removed the material completely. The Reciproc system removed significantly more material than the ProTaper Universal (P < 0.001) and Reciproc Blue (P = 0.005) systems, with the latter two exhibiting equal volumes of remaining material (P = 0.068). Conclusion: The Reciproc system was more effective than the Reciproc Blue and ProTaper Universal Retreatment systems during the removal of filling material from oval, straight canals, although none of the systems completely removed the filling material.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleInternational Endodontic Journal
Numberingvol. 52, no. 1, pp. 105-113
p-ISSN0143-2885
e-ISSN1365-2591
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12985
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:127:041911
Publication2018-07-25
Document URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.12985
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-10-24 09:36:31