prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata
Zagreb: Catholic University of Croatia, 2021. urn:nbn:hr:224:812287
Inđić, Vlatko
Catholic University of Croatia
Department of Psychology

Institutional repository: Digital Repository of the Catholic University of Croatia

Cite this document

Inđić, V. (2021). Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata (Master's thesis). Zagreb: Catholic University of Croatia. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:812287

Inđić, Vlatko. "Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata." Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, 2021. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:812287

Inđić, Vlatko. "Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata." Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, 2021. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:812287

Inđić, V. (2021). 'Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata', Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, accessed 28 March 2025, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:812287

Inđić V. Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata [Master's thesis]. Zagreb: Catholic University of Croatia; 2021 [cited 2025 March 28] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:812287

V. Inđić, "Neki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata", Master's thesis, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, 2021. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:224:812287

Metadata
TitleNeki prediktori akademskog nepoštenja kod studenata
Title (english)Some predictors of academic dishonesty among students
AuthorVlatko Inđić
MentorTajana Ljubin Golub (mentor)
Committee memberMajda Rijavec (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberIvana Vrselja (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberTajana Ljubin Golub (član povjerenstva)
GranterCatholic University of Croatia
(Department of Psychology)
Zagreb
Defense date and country2021-09-30, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Psychology
Abstract
U ovom diplomskom radu cilj je bio istraţiti neke od prediktora akademskog nepoštenja te utvrditi koje varijable više doprinose akademskom nepoštenju kod studenata u Hrvatskoj. U istraţivanju je sudjelovalo 532 studenata sa sveučilišta, veleučilišta i visokih škola diljem Hrvatske. Za potrebe istraţivanja upotrijebljeno je šest mjernih instrumenata koji uključuju sljedeće varijable: demografski faktori (spol, dob, godina studija), motivacijske faktore (akademsku samoefikasnost), značajke... More ličnosti (poštenje-poniznost, potreba za postignućem) te kontekstualne faktore (percipirani stres, percipirana socijalna pravda, normativna prihvatljivost akademskog nepoštenja). Upitnici koji su upotrebljavani u ovom istraţivanju jesu: Subskala o učestalosti varanja (Petrak i Bartolac 2014), Upitnik percepcije socijalne pravednosti za odrasle (Druţić Ljubotina, 2007), Skala akademske samoefikasnosti (Pintrich, Smith, Garcia i McKeachie, 1993), Subskala HEXACO 100 dimenzija poštenja (Ashton i Lee, 2005), Skala potrebe za postignućem (Eisenberger i sur., 2005), Skala percipiranoga stresa (Hudek-Kneţević i sur. 1999) te subskala o prihvatljivosti varanja (Petrak i Bartolac, 2014). Metodom hijerarhijsko regresijske analize ukupna proporcija varijance kriterija prediktorima moţe se objasniti s 40,9%. Značajni prediktori koji su također imali značajni inkrementalni doprinos jesu varijable poštenje-poniznost i normativna prihvatljivost akademskog nepoštenja. Less
Abstract (english)
The aim of this paper, was to investigate some of the predictors of academic dishonesty among students in Croatia. The study included 532 students from universities and colleges across the Croatia. For the purposes of the research, 6 measuring instruments were used, which include the following variables: demographic variables (gender, age, year of study, type of study), motivational factors (academic self-efficacy), personality traits (honesty-humility, need for achievement) and... More contextual factors (perceived stress, perceived social justice, normative acceptability of academic dishonesty). The researche was conducted by using questionnaires: Cheating frequency subscale (Petrak and Bartolac, 2014), Questionnaire of perception of social justice for adults (Druţić Ljubotina, 2007), Scale of academic self-efficiency (Pintrich, Smith, Garcia and McKeachie, 1993), Subscale HEXACO 100 dimensions of honesty (Ashton i Lee, 2005), Scale of need for achievement (Eisenberger et al., 2005), the Perceived Stress Scale (Hudek-Kneţević et al. 1999) and Subscale of acceptability of academic dishonesty (Petrak and Bartolac, 2014). By the method of hierarchical regression analysis, the total proportion of criterion variance by predictors can be explained with 40.9%. Significant predictors that also had a significant incremental contribution were the honesty-humility and the normative acceptability of academic dishonesty. Less
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:224:812287
Study programmeTitle: Department of Psychology
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra psihologije (magistar/magistra psihologije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-10-06 07:49:23
accessibility

closeAccessibilityrefresh

If you wish to permanently save changes, click on Save, if not - your settings will be reset when you restart the browser.