Once the outcome of an event becomes known to them, people have a tendency to shift the perceived inevitability of that outcome towards becoming more convinced of its higher probability, compared to the probability assessments they would have given had they not been familiar with the outcome. In other words, it becomes easier to notice the event causality and to disregard information which doesn't seem relevant when one observes them in the light of a known outcome. This phenomenon is recognized as hindsight bias, but other popular terms are also used, such as the ''knew it all along'' effect. For some time, it had been considered that hindsight bias could be decreased by generating a number of alternative outcomes, but newer research indicated that task difficulty has great importance in the matter and revealed the possibility or that strategy to backfire. The main objective of this study was to examine if the above-mentioned task difficulty effect could be replicated in a context which involved a rape of a young woman. The goal was to find out whether the difficulty of a task has any effect on probability assessments of alternative outcomes in this specific, socially sensitive context. This study involved 163 female student participants from different study levels at the University of Zadar, mostly from humanities and social sciences university programs. Participants were divided into four experimental and one control group and were all asked to read the same story, but with different outcomes. Task difficulty was operationalized as a number of alternative outcomes the participants were asked to generate (2 vs 10). The results didn't show the presence of any task difficulty effects on probability assessments of alternative outcomes. Additionally, the aim of this research was to also investigate the correlation between attitudes toward rape victims and probability assessments of event outcomes, where the results indicated no significant correlation.