Paul K. Feyerabend is reputed to be one of the most controversial contemporary philosophers, a theorist of science whose name is associated with methodological anarchism, relativism, and critical skepticism. Feyerabend argues that in the history of science and scientific research, there are no rules that have never been broken. His view is that only by the method of pluralism can we advance science. Feyerabend seeks to show the reason, in the form in which it is defended by logicans, philosophers and some scientists does not confirm to science and that it could not contribute to its growth. Science is not sacred and inviolable. It provides us with detailed arguments for a ''counter - rule'' that encourages us to introduce hypotheses inconsistent with well – founded theories. Just as democratic pluralism shouls prevail in society, so it seeks to apply it to the methodology of scientific procedure. An example of this is found in Galileo, pointing out tha he did not come to new knowledge, but all this was already generally known, but hidden. Galileo, despite opposition from the church and science, remained consistent with his theory. He also critizies Popper for the principle of consistency because he protects old theories, not new ones that are better. It is necessary to replace singular methods of science with pluralism of views and thus develop citizens's creativity of spirit and innovation. The purpose of Feyerabend's scientific anarchism is not to reject the legitimacy of the mind, but to try to ''undermine'' the imposed structures of imperialism in the form of proclaimed universal, abstract philosophical norms such as ''truth, honesty, justice'' behind which the real goal of explotation is hidden, and the expoitation of man.