Title Usporedni prikaz općih metoda tretmana zatvorenika u zemljama Europske unije
Title (english) Comparison of General Methods of Prisoner Treatment in European Union Countries
Author Tena Novak
Mentor Ljiljana Mikšaj-Todorović (mentor)
Committee member Ljiljana Mikšaj-Todorović (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee member Dalibor Doležal (član povjerenstva)
Committee member Anita Jandrić Nišević (član povjerenstva)
Granter University of Zagreb Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences Zagreb
Defense date and country 2017-07-10, Croatia
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline SOCIAL SCIENCES Education/Rehabilitation Sciences
Abstract Iako se metode tretmana zatvorenika razlikuju od države do države, postoji konsenzus oko korištenja općih metoda tretmana koje se odnose na rad, obrazovanje i slobodno vrijeme zatvorenika. Ciljevi ovog rada su načiniti usporednu analizu formalnih dokumenata koji oblikuju opće metode tretmana u zemljama Europske Unije te dati prikaz primjera dobre prakse u provođenju. Svrha ovog rada je kritička analiza rezultata poredbe i primjera dobre prakse te formiranje prijedloga za unapređenje zatvora i kaznionica Republike Hrvatske u području općih metoda tretmana.
Radom je utvrđeno neslaganje između zakonskih propisa i svakodnevne prakse, najčešće zbog utjecaja izvan kontrole zatvorskih sustava zemalja članica Europske Unije. Iako postoje neslaganja, postoje i brojni primjeri dobre prakse, od onih iz područja rada zatvorenika, do slobodnog vremena, ali i pojedinih primjera koji spajaju tri područja metoda tretmana zatvorenika. Republika Hrvatska s obzirom na vlastite resurse, ekonomsku situaciju, uvjete i mogućnosti svojim zatvorenicima pruža kvalitetan tretman u usporedbi s ostalim zemljama Europske Unije.
Kritike koje se odnose na opće metode tretmana zatvorenika jesu nedostatak dostupnih izvješća vezanih uz njihovo provođenje, kao i nedostatak transparentnosti u provođenju istih. Osim toga, za većinu programa ne postoji adekvatna evaluacija te postoji generalni nedostatak informacija o programima unutar kaznionica i zatvora.
Autorica smatra da je za unaprjeđenja općih metoda tretmana na području rada u Republici Hrvatskoj potrebno kreirati i provoditi programe koji bi zatvorenike pripremili za traženje zaposlenja i predstavljanje sebe kao potencijalnih zaposlenika te proširenje mogućnosti zaposlenja na zahtjevnijim poslovima. Također, preporuča se proširenje mreže suradnje s civilnim sektorom u području obrazovanja zatvorenika, korištenje zatvorenika sa specijalnim vještinama i znanjima za neformalno obrazovanje drugih zatvorenika te edukacija strukovnih učitelja i priprema za rad sa zatvorskom populacijom. Preporuke u vezi slobodnog vremena odnose se na poticanje zatvorskog osoblja na razmjenu ideja i informacija jer svaki od navedenih primjera dobre prakse u nekom obliku već postoji unutar hrvatskog zatvorskog sustava. Stoga je zadnja preporuka upućena zatvorskom osoblju koje takve prakse provodi te ih se potiče na bilježenje, objavljivanje i širenje iskustva kako bi svojim primjerima doprinijeli kvaliteti općih metoda tretmana u Republici Hrvatskoj.
Abstract (english) Although methods of treatment of prisoners differ from state to state, there is a consensus about the use of general methods of treatment related to the work, education and leisure time of prisoners. The aim of the paper is to make a comparative analysis of formal documents that shape the general methods of treatment in the European Union countries and give examples of good practices in carrying them. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the results of comparisons and examples of good practice and the creation of proposals for the promotion of prison and penal institutions of the Republic of Croatia in the field of general methods of treatment.
Disagreements between legal regulations and everyday practices were identified in the paper, mostly because of the impacts that are not in control of prison systems of individual EU member states. Although there are disagreements, there are numerous examples of good practices. Considering its resources, economic situation, conditions and opportunities, the Republic of Croatia offers quality treatment to its prisoners in comparison with other European Union countries.
The criticisms of the general methods of treatment of prisoners are the lack of available reports on the work, education and leisure time of prisoners, lack of evaluation, as well as lack of transparency in carrying them out. The author thinks that to improve the general methods of treatment in the work area, it is necessary to create and implement programs that prepare prisoners for job search and representing themselves as potential employees, as well as expansion of employment opportunities in more demanding jobs. It is also recommended to: extend the network of civil-sector cooperation in the area of prison education, use prisoners with special skills and knowledge for informal education of other inmates, and to educate vocational teachers to prepare them for work with the prison population. Recommendations regarding free time relate to encouraging prison staff to exchange ideas and information because each of these examples of good practice in some form already exists within the Croatian prison system. Therefore, the last recommendation is addressed to prison staff practicing such practices and encourages them to record, publish, and disseminate their experiences in order to contribute to the quality of the general methods of treatment in the Republic of Croatia.
Keywords
tretman
zatvor
kaznionica
Europska Unija
Keywords (english)
treatment
prison
jail
European Union
Language croatian
URN:NBN urn:nbn:hr:158:850854
Study programme Title: Social Pedagogy Study programme type: university Study level: graduate Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra socijalne pedagogije (magistar/magistra socijalne pedagogije)
Type of resource Text
File origin Born digital
Access conditions Open access
Terms of use
Created on 2017-07-18 09:07:28