prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva
Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023. urn:nbn:hr:131:587122
Mikec, Josip
University of Zagreb
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Department of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology

Institutional repository: ODRAZ

Cite this document

Mikec, J. (2023). Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva (Master's thesis). Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:587122

Mikec, Josip. "Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva." Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:587122

Mikec, Josip. "Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva." Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:587122

Mikec, J. (2023). 'Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva', Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, accessed 24 December 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:587122

Mikec J. Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva [Master's thesis]. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; 2023 [cited 2024 December 24] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:587122

J. Mikec, "Uzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva", Master's thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Zagreb, 2023. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:587122

Metadata
TitleUzroci sukoba u prirodnom stanju kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua - političkoantropološka perspektiva
Title (english)Causes of conflict in the state of nature in Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau - a political-anthropological perspective
AuthorJosip Mikec
MentorDuško Petrović (mentor)
Committee memberGoran-Pavel Šantek (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberIvan Grkeš (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberDuško Petrović (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Zagreb
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
(Department of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology)
Zagreb
Defense date and country2023-09-26, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Ethnology and Anthropology
Anthropology
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Political Philosophy
Abstract
U ovom radu pružio sam analizu prirodnog stanja i uzroka sukoba kod Hobbesa, Lockea i Rousseaua, koji su glavni predstavnici kontraktualističke teorije. Oni žele pojasniti kako bi izgledalo društvo bez političkog autoriteta. Svaki od njih drugačije vidi ljudsku prirodu i slobodu. Zbog toga su njihova rješenja za nastale sukobe različita. Za razliku od Lockea koji želi ograničenu vlast kojoj je prioritet očuvanje privatnog vlasništva, Hobbes i Rousseau zauzimaju kontroverzniju ideju apsolutističke vlasti. Hobbesu je apsolutni vladar jamac sigurnosti i stabilnosti, a Rousseau opća volja predstavlja idealni način ostvarivanja čovjeka u političkoj zajednici. Političko djelovanje i individualizam naglašavaju podjelu na javnu i privatnu sferu što problematiziram u zaključnim razmatranjima. Republikanizam i liberalizam su dvije ključne teorije koje nam opisuju dužnosti građana u državi.
Abstract (english)
In this paper I have provided an analysis of the state of nature and the causes of conflict in Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, who are the main representatives of contractualist theory. They aim to explain what society would look like without political authority. Each of them perceives human nature and freedom differently, leading to different solutions for resolving conflicts. Unlike Locke, who advocates for limited government with a priority on preservation of private property, Hobbes and Rousseau embrace more controversial ideas of absolutist rule. Hobbes sees the absolute ruler as the guarantor of security and stability, while Rousseau's concept of the general will represents the ideal way of achieving human fulfillment within political community. Political action and individualism emphasize the division into the private and public spheres, which I elaborate in the concluding considerations. Republicanism and liberalism are two key theories that describe the duties of citizens in the state.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:131:587122
Study programmeTitle: Anthropology (double major)
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra antropologije (magistar/magistra antropologije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-09-28 13:03:52