prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation
  Download
PDF 1.53 MB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation
Transplant International, 36 (2023); 11589. https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589
Afrouzian, Marjan; Kozakowski, Nicolas; Liapis, Helen; Broecker, Verena; Truong, Luan; Avila-Casado, Carmen; Regele, Heinz; Seshan, Surya; Ambruzs, Josephine M.; Farris, Alton Brad; Buob, David; Chander, Praveen N.; Cheraghvandi, Lukman; Clahsen-van Groningen, Marian C.; de Almeida Araujo, Stanley; Ertoy Baydar, Dilek; Formby, Mark; Galešić Ljubanović, Danica; Herrera Hernandez, Loren; Honsova, Eva; Mohamed, Nasreen; Ozluk, Yasemin; Rabant, Marion; Royal, Virginie; Stevenson, Heather L.; Toniolo, Maria Fernanda; Taheri, Diana More authors...

Institutional repository: Dr Med - University of Zagreb School of Medicine Digital Repository

Cite this document

Afrouzian, M., Kozakowski, N., Liapis, H., Broecker, V., Truong, L., Avila Casado, C. ... Taheri, D. (2023). Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation. Transplant International, 36.. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian, Marjan, et al. "Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation." Transplant International, vol. 36, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian, Marjan, Nicolas Kozakowski, Helen Liapis, Verena Broecker, Luan Truong, Carmen Avila Casado, Heinz Regele, et al. "Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation." Transplant International 36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian, M., et al. (2023) 'Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation', Transplant International, 36. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian M, Kozakowski N, Liapis H, Broecker V, Truong L, Avila Casado C, and sur.. Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation. Transplant International [Internet]. 2023 August 23 [cited 2024 July 13];36. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11589

M. Afrouzian, et al., "Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation", Transplant International, vol. 36, August 2023. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:105008. [Accessed: 13 July 2024]

Metadata
Title (english)Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation
AuthorMarjan Afrouzian
AuthorNicolas Kozakowski
AuthorHelen Liapis
AuthorVerena Broecker
AuthorLuan Truong
AuthorCarmen Avila-Casado
AuthorHeinz Regele
AuthorSurya Seshan
AuthorJosephine M. Ambruzs
AuthorAlton Brad Farris
AuthorDavid Buob
AuthorPraveen N. Chander
AuthorLukman Cheraghvandi
AuthorMarian C. Clahsen-van Groningen
AuthorStanley de Almeida Araujo
AuthorDilek Ertoy Baydar
AuthorMark Formby
AuthorDanica Galešić Ljubanović
AuthorLoren Herrera Hernandez
AuthorEva Honsova
AuthorNasreen Mohamed
AuthorYasemin Ozluk
AuthorMarion Rabant
AuthorVirginie Royal
AuthorHeather L. Stevenson
AuthorMaria Fernanda Toniolo
AuthorDiana Taheri
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
(Department of Pathology)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Pathology
Abstract (english)
The Thrombotic Microangiopathy Banff Working Group (TMA-BWG) was formed in 2015 to survey current practices and develop minimum diagnostic criteria (MDC) for renal transplant TMA (Tx-TMA). To generate consensus among pathologists and nephrologists, the TMA BWG designed a 3-Phase study. Phase I of the study is presented here. Using the Delphi methodology, 23 panelists with >3 years of diagnostic experience with Tx-TMA pathology listed their MDC suggesting light, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy lesions, clinical and laboratory information, and differential diagnoses. Nine rounds (R) of consensus resulted in MDC validated during two Rs using online evaluation of whole slide digital images of 37 biopsies (28 TMA, 9 non-TMA). Starting with 338 criteria the process resulted in 24 criteria and 8 differential diagnoses including 18 pathologic, 2 clinical, and 4 laboratory criteria. Results show that 3/4 of the panelists agreed on the diagnosis of 3/4 of cases. The process also allowed definition refinement for 4 light and 4 electron microscopy lesions. For the first time in Banff classification, the Delphi methodology was used to generate consensus. The study shows that Delphi is a democratic and cost-effective method allowing rapid consensus generation among numerous physicians dealing with large number of criteria in transplantation.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleTransplant International
Numberingvol. 36, 11589
e-ISSN1432-2277
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:105008
Publication2023-08-23
Document URLhttps://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2023.11589/full
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) icon
Created on2024-06-19 11:13:02