prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation
  Preuzmi
PDF 1.53 MB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation
Transplant International, 36 (2023); 11589. https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589
Afrouzian, Marjan; Kozakowski, Nicolas; Liapis, Helen; Broecker, Verena; Truong, Luan; Avila-Casado, Carmen; Regele, Heinz; Seshan, Surya; Ambruzs, Josephine M.; Farris, Alton Brad; Buob, David; Chander, Praveen N.; Cheraghvandi, Lukman; Clahsen-van Groningen, Marian C.; de Almeida Araujo, Stanley; Ertoy Baydar, Dilek; Formby, Mark; Galešić Ljubanović, Danica; Herrera Hernandez, Loren; Honsova, Eva; Mohamed, Nasreen; Ozluk, Yasemin; Rabant, Marion; Royal, Virginie; Stevenson, Heather L.; Toniolo, Maria Fernanda; Taheri, Diana Više autora...

Institucijski repozitorij: Dr Med - digitalni repozitorij Medicinskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu

Citirajte ovaj rad

Afrouzian, M., Kozakowski, N., Liapis, H., Broecker, V., Truong, L., Avila Casado, C. ... Taheri, D. (2023). Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation. Transplant International, 36.. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian, Marjan, et al. "Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation." Transplant International, vol. 36, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian, Marjan, Nicolas Kozakowski, Helen Liapis, Verena Broecker, Luan Truong, Carmen Avila Casado, Heinz Regele, et al. "Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation." Transplant International 36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian, M., et al. (2023) 'Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation', Transplant International, 36. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11589

Afrouzian M, Kozakowski N, Liapis H, Broecker V, Truong L, Avila Casado C, i sur.. Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation. Transplant International [Internet]. 23.08.2023. [pristupljeno 13.07.2024.];36. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11589

M. Afrouzian, et al., "Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation", Transplant International, vol. 36, Kolovoz 2023. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:105008. [Citirano: 13.07.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:105008
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation
AutorMarjan Afrouzian
AutorNicolas Kozakowski
AutorHelen Liapis
AutorVerena Broecker
AutorLuan Truong
AutorCarmen Avila-Casado
AutorHeinz Regele
AutorSurya Seshan
AutorJosephine M. Ambruzs
AutorAlton Brad Farris
AutorDavid Buob
AutorPraveen N. Chander
AutorLukman Cheraghvandi
AutorMarian C. Clahsen-van Groningen
AutorStanley de Almeida Araujo
AutorDilek Ertoy Baydar
AutorMark Formby
AutorDanica Galešić Ljubanović
AutorLoren Herrera Hernandez
AutorEva Honsova
AutorNasreen Mohamed
AutorYasemin Ozluk
AutorMarion Rabant
AutorVirginie Royal
AutorHeather L. Stevenson
AutorMaria Fernanda Toniolo
AutorDiana Taheri
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Zagrebu
Medicinski fakultet
(KATEDRA ZA PATOLOGIJU)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Patologija
Sažetak (engleski)
The Thrombotic Microangiopathy Banff Working Group (TMA-BWG) was formed in 2015 to survey current practices and develop minimum diagnostic criteria (MDC) for renal transplant TMA (Tx-TMA). To generate consensus among pathologists and nephrologists, the TMA BWG designed a 3-Phase study. Phase I of the study is presented here. Using the Delphi methodology, 23 panelists with >3 years of diagnostic experience with Tx-TMA pathology listed their MDC suggesting light, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy lesions, clinical and laboratory information, and differential diagnoses. Nine rounds (R) of consensus resulted in MDC validated during two Rs using online evaluation of whole slide digital images of 37 biopsies (28 TMA, 9 non-TMA). Starting with 338 criteria the process resulted in 24 criteria and 8 differential diagnoses including 18 pathologic, 2 clinical, and 4 laboratory criteria. Results show that 3/4 of the panelists agreed on the diagnosis of 3/4 of cases. The process also allowed definition refinement for 4 light and 4 electron microscopy lesions. For the first time in Banff classification, the Delphi methodology was used to generate consensus. The study shows that Delphi is a democratic and cost-effective method allowing rapid consensus generation among numerous physicians dealing with large number of criteria in transplantation.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaTransplant International
Brojčani podacivol. 36, 11589
e-ISSN1432-2277
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11589
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:105008
Datum objave publikacije2023-08-23
URL dokumentahttps://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2023.11589/full
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Imenovanje 4.0 međunarodna (CC BY 4.0)
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2024-06-19 11:13:02