prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Uvjetna osuda
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Uvjetna osuda
Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2017. urn:nbn:hr:132:950539
Medved, Damir
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
Chair of Criminal Law

Institutional repository: Repository of Faculty of Law in Osijek

Cite this document

Medved, D. (2017). Uvjetna osuda (Master's thesis). Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:950539

Medved, Damir. "Uvjetna osuda." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2017. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:950539

Medved, Damir. "Uvjetna osuda." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2017. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:950539

Medved, D. (2017). 'Uvjetna osuda', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, accessed 25 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:950539

Medved D. Uvjetna osuda [Master's thesis]. Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek; 2017 [cited 2024 November 25] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:950539

D. Medved, "Uvjetna osuda", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, Osijek, 2017. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:950539

Metadata
TitleUvjetna osuda
Title (english)Suspended Sentence
AuthorDamir Medved
MentorIgor Vuletić (mentor)
Committee memberZvonimir Tomičić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberTunjica Petrašević (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberIgor Vuletić (član povjerenstva)
GranterJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
(Chair of Criminal Law)
Osijek
Defense date and country2017-07-11, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Criminology and Victimology
Abstract
Uvjetna osuda najčešća je mjera koja se izriče počiniteljima kaznenih djela u Republici Hrvatskoj (u 2016. godini ona je izreknuta u 80,29% slučajeva), te je zakonodavac potaknut njezinom inertnošću i zaostalošću kao instituta 2011. godine odlučio ući u njezino temeljito redefiniranje i repozicioniranje u sustavu kaznenopravnih sankcija. Tako je Kaznenim zakonom iz 2011. godine napušten koncept uvjetne osude kao samostalne sankcije – mjere upozorenja, i prihvaćen je “novi” koncept uvjetne osude kao pukog odgađanja izvršenja kazne. Zakonodavac je odredio da sud može izreći uvjetnu osudu samo ako počinitelju izrekne kaznu zatvora u trajanju do jedne godine (prihvaćen je isključivo konkretni kriterij) pod objašnjenjem da se time želi smanjiti broj izrečenih uvjetnih osuda (iako je katalog djela za koja se može izreći uvjetna osuda veći no ikada prije). Zbog toga je uvedena mogućnost izricanja djelomične uvjetne osude za teža kaznena djela koja su okarakterizirana težom krivnjom odn. težom kaznom. Posebno velik pomak napravljen je kod normiranja posebnih obveza jer se sada obveze iz čl. 62. st. 2. (kod kojih lista nije konačna jer sud može odrediti i druge obveze) mogu izreći i zbog zaštite žrtve, a osim toga moguće je uz uvjetnu osudu izreći i sigurnosnu mjeru zabrane približavanja, uznemiravanja ili uhođenja žrtve, čime se u znatnoj mjeri štite prava žrtve. Uz to bi sud mogao izreći i zaštitni nadzor nad izvršavanjem obveza iz čl. 62. st. 2. čime bi se prava žrtve još više zaštitila. Kaznenim zakonom iz 2011. godine napravljen je pozitivan pomak prema uvjetnoj osudi koja bi trebala biti primjerena kaznenopravna reakcija na lakša i srednje teška kaznena djela, a kojom bi se mogla ostvariti kako specijalna tako i generalna prevencija.
Abstract (english)
Suspended sentence is the most common penalty applied on criminal offenders in Republic of Croatia (in 2016 it was applied in 80,29% of cases). In 2011, provoked by its inert and backwardness, legislator decided to go in fundamental redefining and repositioning of suspended sentence in the criminal law sanctions system. So new Criminal code has been passed in 2011, in which an old concept of suspended sentence as “non-custiodal measure” was abandoned and “new” concept of “delaying of a defendant's serving of a punishment” was adopted. Suspended sentence can be applied if a offender is sentenced to imprisonment for period up to one year (it has been accepted exclusively real criterion). Legislator intention was to reduce the number of application of suspended sentences (but paradoxically the number of criminal acts on which suspended sentence is applicable is larger then ever). Cause of that, legislator provided partial suspended sentence for heavier criminal offenses. A large step was made in regulation of special obligations, expecially in a field of protecting the victim. Obligations from arcticle 62 paragraph 2 can now be applied for the protection of victim. Besides, a court can decide to forbid convict to approach, harass or stalk the victim (security measure). A court can also apply probation supervision on special obligations from arcticle 62 paragraph 2. Combining all three measures up above the rights of victim can be properly protected. A positive shift has been made in regulation of suspended sentence as a measure that can properly answer to light and medium-heavy criminal offenses, also accomplishing the general purpose of criminal sanctions.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:132:950539
Study programmeTitle: Law
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2018-01-31 10:48:31