Nowadays, an increasing number of people are facing a stroke. As the percentage of stroke survivors also increases, so does the number of people who develop aphasia as a result. With the aim of overcoming the shortcomings of existing theories aimed at providing guidelines for the assessment of narrative abilities as well as their subsequent stimulation as part of the treatment of people with aphasia, Dipper et al. (2021) developed a unique theoretical framework - Linguistic Underpinnings of Narrative in Aphasia (LUNA). Although according to this framework the assessment of narrative abilities can take place at four levels, this paper is focused only on some measures at the macro-structural and micro-structural level. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to investigate the structural features, coherence features and linguistic features in the personal narratives of people with aphasia. Eleven people with aphasia and twelve people with normal language status participated in the study. Participants were assessed using the Global TALES protocol (Westervald et al., 2022), which had previously been adapted for the adult population. The results of the study showed that at the macrostructural level, people with aphasia differ statistically significant from people with normal language status when it comes to stating solutions in personal narratives and producing errors of global coherence. Thus, people with aphasia are less likely to state solutions in stories and generally produce more errors of global coherence. Looking at the types of errors, they only produce statistically significant more filler utterances. Regarding the microstructural level, the stories of people with aphasia are significantly shorter and contain significantly more semantic and phonological errors than those of people with normal language status. These results show that, in addition to obvious difficulties at the linguistic level, people with aphasia may also show impaired maintenance of the story structure and global coherence as elements of the macrostructural level, which can consequently contribute to difficulties in their overall communication competence.