In this paper the idea was to present a citizen in the philosophy of H. Arendt. The idea went through the ancient tradition of the political, from which H. Arendt takes a large part, primarily, the part of which we bind with Aristotel and therefore follows a great chapter on Aristotelic political philosophy. Also, the work exhibited three activities of "Vita Activae", work, production and action. In the analysis mentioned, we see how much importance H. Arendt gives to activity of action. Consequently, one whole chapter is devoted to plurality, although the idea of plurality permeated through the entire work. Among other things, there is talk of criticism of Christianity, which aboles the gap between public and private. Namely, without public and private there is no political. I referred to J.J. Rousseau and J. Habermasa, and cited the differences in relation to H. Arendt in terms of politics, economics, power and violence. When it comes to the idea of a citizen, it is necessary to touch the "ideal state solution", and accordingly follows the chapter on the state arrangement that we think H.Arendt aspires to. Finally, the conclusion is a parallel between the 21st century and the opinion of H.Arendt.