In this thesis, we examine the concept of love within an educational upbringing, we try to see if there is or if there is not a room for love within education. For this purpose, we define and compare two contrary philosophical concepts regarding the relationship between upbringing, education and love. Croatian philosopher Pavao Vuk-Pavlovic considers love as the most important element of education and upbringing, where German philosopher Max Scheler states that there is no place for love in environment of educational upbringing. In the part of the thesis that analyses Vuk-Pavlovic’s philosophy of education, we consider the actual relation between the teacher and his student because of the crucial role of educational love in his theory of education. Regarding Max Scheler’s view of education, we analyze his phenomenology of love and also the theory of values. Furthermore, we will explain in detail what is considered education to Scheler, or more precisely, what is the essential nature of education. We will examine why there is no possibility of a concept of love within the concept of upbringing and educating within Scheler’s philosophy, and also why there is no room for educating while loving. The most important part of this thesis is the consideration of the differences and similarities between the concepts of Vuk-Pavlovic and Scheler because it evaluates the key points of their teachings and leads to the conclusion about the possibilities and limits of love in education in Vuk-Pavlovic’s and Scheler’s philosophy of education.