After the events that took place at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021, Twitter has assessed that then-president Donald Trump has violated their policy on using Twitter to incite violence among other things. Due to the risk of further incitement of violence, Donald Trump’s account has been permanently suspended. In the context of broader events, this paper has examined in which ways the selected Tweets can be interpreted when it comes to inciting violence and how can Trump’s tweets be mobilized by various audiences. For the purpose of this research, a small-scale corpus containing 107 Tweets and Retweets was created. After presenting the theoretical framework and the research methodology, the corpus of the study was analyzed with the main focus put on the discursive strategies of the DHA. Other linguistic phenomena such as the representation of social actors were also investigated. The aim of this paper was to analyze the collected data and to determine if the Tweets in question may contribute to inciting violence. The results have shown that it can be presumed that the Tweets in question can increase the risk of violence due to the fact that Donald Trump chose not to condemn but rather endorse violent acts in some of the Tweets. The content of certain Tweets in the corpus can be perceived and received in a manner that could potentially lead to further violence.