This paper provides an overview of the End of the Battle of Vukovar in Croatian and Serbian newspapers from November 1 to November 30, 1991. Two Croatian daily newspapers are analyzed (The Vjesnik and The Večernji list) and two Serbian ones (The Politika and The Večernje novosti) as well. Qualitative and quantitative analysis are used to compare all forementioned newspapers in order to check whether they match or differ from each other and if so, in what way. Also, this paper intends to answer the question of whether the aforementioned newspapers dailies were in service of state propaganda. The paper deals with one more question: which of the newspapers dailies has proven the most credible. The study will provide us with an answer whether these newspaper articles are sufficient as a source for writing a scientific paper on the Battle of Vukovar. What is analyzed are the articles, types of titles, the presence of accompanying photographs and their role as well as the frequency of the use of different derogatory terminology applying to the enemy army. The results have shown that both the Croatian and Serbian media can be accused of using propaganda and therefore, there is presence of bias and lack of objectivity in them. Nevertheless, Croatian newspapers are the ones which are more similar to historical accounts used today. Also, this paper displays the historical situation in Croatia in the early 90s with an emphasis on the political situation of those days. Furthermore, the observation of the rules of war journalism is accentuated so that we can interpret a given newspaper through the prism of journalistic ethics. Two topics have been chosen to review the vision of Croatian and Serbian newspapers: the massacre of Serbian children in Borovo Naselje and the evacuation of civilians from the Vukovar hospital.