There are non-existent or small differences in the functionality of psychotherapies, i.e. their effectiveness in achieving therapeutic outcomes. One explanation for these differences are common factors that all functional psychotherapies share. One of the most researched common factor is the alliance between psychotherapist and client. Since there are conflicting findings regarding the differences in self-assesment of alliance qualities with specific clients between psychotherapists of various therapeutic affiliations, we were interested in whether psychotherapists of various affiliations differ in self-assessments of the qualities of the general therapeutic alliance with all of their clients. Scientific work on the wisdom of therapists points to wisdom as an important therapist characteristic and a common factor associated with alliance. The association between measures of wisdom and alliance has not been researched, so we were interested in whether therapists' self-assessments of the qualities of the general therapeutic alliance and self-assesments of wisdom were positively related. We were also interested in whether there are differences in self-assesments of wisdom between therapists of various therapeutic affiliations, which has also not been researched. 276 therapists of six different therapeutic affiliations took part in our research, and the total results of the self-assesment measures of general alliance and wisdom they completed were moderately related (rs = .50). That is, a therapist, regardless of affiliation, who asseses his therapeutic relationships as more viable is also more likely to asses himself as wiser (and vice versa). Finally, the results point to group differences in self-assesments of the qualities of the general therapeutic alliance and wisdom between therapists of various affiliations that need to be discussed and studied in more detail.