In the master’s thesis "The media image of Međimurje Roma: an analysis of journalists, editors and readers opinions in Međimurske novine and List Međimurje", through the discourse and content analysis, we give the respond to the main question "Has the attitude and opinion of the editorial of Međimurske novine and the List Međimurje changed about Roma after the judgment of the European Court For Human Rights in Strasbourg?" In Međimurje Roma are a national minority, still segregated and marginalized in almost all social areas. In addition to the weaker economic status, they are marginalized in the area of education which should give everyone the same foundation for the future. Because of the ethnic discrimination and the classification of Roma children into separate classes, fifteen Roma students from Međimurje submitted a constitutional complaint on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, which was rejected. In 2010, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg ruled in favor of the Roma and condemned Croatia for violating the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Three hypotheses have been confirmed in this paper which, through discourse and content analysis, have demonstrated that media reporting in the two largest weekly newspapers in Medjimurje was softened after judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in 2010, furthermore citizens, despite the verdict, did not change their opinions and attitudes towards Roma, and that there is a visible difference in the reporting between the Međimurske novine and the List of Međimurje. Međimurje newspapers are more critical and give wide and clearer view about Roma minority in Međimurje.