Sažetak | Pri usporedbi HRT-a i BBC-a treba imati na umu kako se ta dva javna medijska servisa osim u veličini, kvaliteti i uspješnosti, razlikuju i geografskim poloţajem te sukladno njemu nose i odgovarajuće i specifične karakteristike i odrednice. Jasno je da se HRT od svog nastanka, i do danas neprekinutog procesa razvijanja oduvijek ugledao na BBC kao i mnoge zemlje svijeta posebice one Zapadnog Balkana. BBC je s druge strane veoma rano postao pionir javne medijske kuće koji je svojom neovisnošću o političkim utjecajima i njezi novinarskih vrijednosti postavio temelje na kojima razvoj javnih servisa 20. i 21. stoljeća počiva. Rasprave o javnim medijskim servisima prikriveno su uvijek rasprave o demokraciji i demokratskom ustroju drţave, čak i ako sudionici razgovora toga nisu svjesni. Isprepletenost demokratskog društva s novinarstvom i time javnim medijima, prisutna je danas više no ikad. Paradoks počiva u činjenici da ţivimo u modernom digitalnom svijetu u kojem pojam demokracije predstavlja nešto normalno, dobro i očekivano dok se s druge strane novinarstvo gleda ''kosim'' očima, novinare se podcjenjuje a javne servise proziva zbog zanemarivanja duţnosti prema graĎanima. |
Sažetak (engleski) | Comparing HRT and BBC one should keep in mind that these two public media services besides their size, quality and performance, also differ in geographic position and therefore bear on corresponding and specific features and definitions. It is clear that HRT has always looked up to BBC, its development, production and management, as many other countires in the wourld do, especially those of the Western Balkans. The BBC, on the other hand, has become a pioneer of public media services which, based on its independence of political influence and nurture of journalistic values, laid the foundation upon which the development of public media services of the 20th and 21st centuries rests. Terms of democracy and democratic state organizations are always present in disscusions about public media services, even if the participants of the conversation are not aware of it. The connection between democratic society and journalism, and thus the public media, is present today more than ever. The paradox lies in the fact that we live in a modern digital 5 world where the notion of democracy is normal, good and expected, while on the other hand journalism is now "sloppy", the newspaper is underestimated and the public services are being judged for neglecting their duties towards citizens |