To what extent the Nietzsche’s approach to morality is original depends actually on the originality of his genealogical method. The »Originality« of approach is reflected in a different reflection of moral values, from which arises different requirements to the ethics, but also to the man. One of these requirements is the requirement for the re-evaluation of all values, which at the same time emphasizes the essential feature of man as evaluating/judging human being. Using the genealogy of morality, he tried to justify the prominent moral imperative here formulated as a requirement for establishing a hierarchy of values. To determine the origin of the moral values of good and evil, the origin of conscience, guilt, and responsibility means to observe their conditionality, their variability and on the basis of this, to interpret their (non)generally sense. For Nietzsche, the meaning depends on how the will is interpreted and it tries to interpret their meaning using the will to power. Out of such a different interpretation of will then necessarily arises a need to re-evaluate the current sense, or the need for perspectivism. The perspectivism points out the Nietzsche’s distinctive interpretation of delusions and values of morality (and metaphysics). The mentioned distinction is important because it shows that in the thesis that every morality is a delusion is not shown the Nietzsche’s main complaint against the contemporary morality, nor that on the basis of this claim leads to the conclusion of non-binding of all moralities.