The purpose of the research was to determine the link between objective and subjective parameters recorded by the GPS (Global Positioning System) system, which provides us with objective quantitative parameters during training/match, i.e. subjective load assessment (total distance traveled (UU), distance traveled at high speeds (HSD) , number of accelerations (ACC), duration of training (TT), total load (TL), ratio of acute and chronic load (ACWR (TD), ACWR (HSD), ACWR (ACC), ACWR (SD), ACWR (TL) in weeks with and without injury. The software program z TIBCO Statistica v.13 (TIBCO Statistica Inc, OK, USA) was used to analyze the data obtained in this study. For all measured parameters, the arithmetic mean (AS) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated, while the normality of the distribution was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirn procedure. T-test was used to determine the differences between objective and subjective training load variables of the same name in weeks without and with a recorded injury for dependent samples, the level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The obtained results indicate statistically significant differences between the variables: total distance traveled (TD), number of accelerations (ACC), in the ratio of acute to chronic load (ACWR) in the variables total distance traveled (TD) and number of accelerations (ACC) in weeks with and without injury. On the other hand, there are no statistically significant differences between the variables high-intensity running, duration of training, total load, ratio of acute to chronic load (ACWR (HSD), ACWR (SD), ACWR (TL) in weeks with and without injury. It is recommended that in practice uses a GPS system as a means of load control, but if the club does not have the option, the RPE questionnaire can also potentially indicate an increased risk for injury.