prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
  Preuzmi
PDF 2.76 MB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Diagnostics, 14 (2024), 14; 1575. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14141575
Bartolović, Nina; Car Peterko, Ana; Avirović, Manuela; Šegota Ritoša, Doris; Grgurević Dujmić, Emina; Valković Zujić, Petra

Institucijski repozitorij: Repozitorij Medicinskog fakulteta u Rijeci

Citirajte ovaj rad

Bartolović, N., Car Peterko, A., Avirović, M., Šegota Ritoša, D., Grgurević Dujmić, E. i Valković Zujić, P. (2024). Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Diagnostics, 14. (14). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141575

Bartolović, Nina, et al. "Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis." Diagnostics, vol. 14, br. 14, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14141575

Bartolović, Nina, Ana Car Peterko, Manuela Avirović, Doris Šegota Ritoša, Emina Grgurević Dujmić i Petra Valković Zujić. "Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis." Diagnostics 14, br. 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14141575

Bartolović, N., et al. (2024) 'Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis', Diagnostics, 14(14). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141575

Bartolović N, Car Peterko A, Avirović M, Šegota Ritoša D, Grgurević Dujmić E, Valković Zujić P. Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Diagnostics [Internet]. 21.07.2024. [pristupljeno 23.11.2024.];14(14). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141575

N. Bartolović, A. Car Peterko, M. Avirović, D. Šegota Ritoša, E. Grgurević Dujmić i P. Valković Zujić, "Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis", Diagnostics, vol. 14, br. 14, Srpanj 2024. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:308099. [Citirano: 23.11.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:308099
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
AutorNina Bartolović
AutorAna Car Peterko
AutorManuela Avirović
AutorDoris Šegota Ritoša
AutorEmina Grgurević Dujmić
AutorPetra Valković Zujić
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Rijeci
Medicinski fakultet
(Katedra za radiologiju)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Radiologija
Sažetak (engleski)
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a relatively new imaging technique that allows morphologic, anatomic and functional imaging of the breast. The aim of our study was to validate contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) compared to mammography (MMG) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in daily clinical practice. This retrospective study included 316 consecutive patients who underwent MMG, DBT and CEM at the Centre for Prevention and Diagnosis of Chronic Diseases of Primorsko-goranska County. Two breast radiologists independently analyzed the image data, without available anamnestic information and without the possibility of comparison with previous images, to determine the presence of suspicious lesions and their morphological features according to the established criteria of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. The diagnostic value of MMG, DBT and CEM was assessed by ROC analysis. The interobserver agreement was excellent. CEM showed higher diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity compared to MMG and DBT, the reporting time for CEM was significantly shorter, and CEM findings resulted in a significantly lower proportion of equivocal findings (BI-RADS 0), suggesting fewer additional procedures. In conclusion, CEM achieves high diagnostic accuracy while maintaining simplicity, reproducibility and applicability in complex clinical settings.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaDiagnostics
Brojčani podacivol. 14, br. 14, 1575
e-ISSN2075-4418
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14141575
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:308099
Datum objave publikacije2024-07-21
URL dokumentahttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/14/1575
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Imenovanje 4.0 međunarodna (CC BY 4.0)
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2024-08-08 07:07:54